Skip to main content

Table 5 Accuracy on FAMeS reads.

From: The effect of sequencing errors on metagenomic gene prediction

 

simLC4

simMC5

simHC6

Method

Sens.2

Spec.3

Sens.2

Spec.3

Sens.2

Spec.3

GeneMark

78.8

85.9

77.3

85.1

77.1

83.0

MetaGene

80.0

78.4

78.8

77.5

78.0

74.9

MetaGeneAnnotator

79.6

80.2

78.4

79.4

77.3

75.6

Orphelia

76.7

85.0

74.9

82.5

74.8

82.0

ESTScan

70.2

96.0

69.3

96.1

69.0

95.0

  1. The gene prediction accuracy of four metagenomic gene prediction tools GeneMark, MetaGene, MetaGeneAnnotator (MGA) and Orphelia, and of the EST processing tool ESTScan on FAMeS reads [4] is shown.