Skip to main content

Expression of G protein-coupled receptors and related proteins in HEK293, AtT20, BV2, and N18 cell lines as revealed by microarray analysis



G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the most widely studied gene superfamilies. Thousands of GPCR research studies have utilized heterologous expression systems such as human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293). Though often treated as 'blank slates', these cell lines nevertheless endogenously express GPCRs and related signaling proteins. The outcome of a given GPCR study can be profoundly influenced by this largely unknown complement of receptors and/or signaling proteins. Little easily accessible information exists that describes the expression profiles of the GPCRs in cell lines. What is accessible is often limited in scope - of the hundreds of GPCRs and related proteins, one is unlikely to find information on expression of more than a dozen proteins in a given cell line. Microarray technology has allowed rapid analysis of mRNA levels of thousands of candidate genes, but though often publicly available, the results can be difficult to efficiently access or even to interpret.


To bridge this gap, we have used microarrays to measure the mRNA levels of a comprehensive profile of non-chemosensory GPCRs and over a hundred GPCR signaling related gene products in four cell lines frequently used for GPCR research: HEK293, AtT20, BV2, and N18.


This study provides researchers an easily accessible mRNA profile of the endogenous signaling repertoire that these four cell lines possess. This will assist in choosing the most appropriate cell line for studying GPCRs and related signaling proteins. It also provides a better understanding of the potential interactions between GPCRs and those signaling proteins.


The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) gene superfamily consists of hundreds of members that are widely expressed in all tissues and serve as receptors for a diverse complement of ligands. Approximately 100 of these receptors are considered orphan GPCRs, in that no endogenous ligand has been confirmed for them [1]. Characterized by having seven transmembrane alpha-helical domains [2], GPCRs mediate a wide spectrum of cellular processes ranging from cell growth to neurotransmission [13]. A number of classification systems for GPCRs have been developed as bioinformatic tools[35]. One of the most commonly used GPCR classification systems, the one set forth by Kolakowski and developed by Vriend [4, 6, 7], groups GPCRs into six classes based on structural similarities to prototypical receptors. Class A GPCRs are the most abundant (>80% of all GPCRs), defined by a high sequence homology to rhodopsin, and include the chemosensory receptors. Class B GPCRs are also known as secretin-like receptors. Class C GPCRs are the metabotropic glutamate-like receptors. Class F/S receptors consist of frizzled/smoothened receptors, though there is debate about their ability to couple to G proteins [2]. Class D/Fungal pheromone and Class E/cAMP receptors are absent in mammals.

On activation via ligand binding, GPCRs couple to heterotrimeric G proteins composed of three subunits: Gα, β and γ. G protein α subunits are classified as members of one of four groups: Gi/o, Gs, Gq, and G12/13 [8]. Each subunit couples to specific cellular protein targets (e.g. adenylyl cyclases) through which cellular activity is modulated. The Gβ/γ G protein subunits are capable of acting at their own specific targets, such as modulating ion channel activity [911]. The available complement of heterotrimeric G proteins will therefore affect its response profile.

A regulatory system controls the timing and duration of GPCR signaling. GPCR kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate agonist-occupied receptors, typically leading to receptor desensitization. Beta-arrestins are scaffolding proteins that are recruited to activated GPCRs and prevent G protein association with the receptor. They also serve to spatially segregate GPCR signaling to molecules such as mitogen-activated protein kinases [12, 13]. The Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which enhance the GTPase activity of Gα subunits, is another large family of proteins important in fine-tuning GPCR signaling [14, 15].

Due to their central roles in many cellular functions, GPCRs are important therapeutic targets. Different reports estimate that between 30 and 50% of all prescription drugs target GPCRs. Interestingly, these drugs only target ~10% of the non-chemosensory receptors, leaving hundreds of GPCRs as potential drug targets [2, 9, 16].

Identifying ligands, studying receptor protein interactions, and measuring cellular effects of receptor activation is often achieved by heterologous expression of GPCRs in cell lines such as HEK293 and AtT20 [17, 18]. They also serve as models of cell types from which they are drawn (e.g. BV2 for microglia and N18 for neurons) [1921]. However these cell lines have remained something of a black box; researchers make use of them without full knowledge of the complement of GPCRs and related proteins. The presence of an unknown protein in these cell lines may confound an otherwise sound series of experiments and differential expression of GPCRs and their regulatory proteins may explain differences in reported results across cell lines [13, 17, 2225]. It is also clear that GPCRs can form oligomers with other GPCRs. These oligomers may confer different signaling properties to a transfected GPCR of interest, and can add layers of variability and complexity.

Efforts to define expression of GPCRs, on a receptor-by-receptor basis, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods have only scratched the surface. Even for the widely used HEK293 cells, the expression of fewer than thirty GPCRs has been described [17, 26]. Recently developed high-throughput methods have made possible the simultaneous assay of mRNA levels for thousands of genes. Microarray analyses have matured sufficiently in terms of accessibility and cost to make their application to this question tractable. We are not the first to make use of microarray technology to examine mRNA expression levels in HEK293 cells [26], however, most studies that have used microarray analyses on these cell lines have examined specific gene products of interest and reported data only for those gene products [20, 2628]. Their full data sets are available through NCBI, but are difficult for the non-specialist user to access and collate.

As a consequence, we sought to identify and make accessible the full complement of endogenously expressed non-chemosensory GPCRs of four cell lines used in GPCR research: the HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 lines. Using microarray analysis we measured the mRNA levels from each of these four cell lines specifically identifying the expression levels of GPCRs and over a hundred of GPCR-related gene products and report them here.


We first examined HEK293 cells, a cell line that was made by transforming human embryonic kidney cells with adenovirus type 5 DNA. Developed in 1977, HEK293 cells may be the single most widely used cell line for heterologous expression (both transient and stable expression) of GPCRs and other proteins of interest [17]. Figures 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 show the mRNA levels of GPCR and GPCR-related gene products found in HEK293 cells. Of Class A GPCRs, shown in figures 1 and 2, HEK293 cells express mRNA for several different types of receptors within specific families of receptors: multiple types of adenosine, lysophospholipid, purinergic, prostanoid, and protease-activated receptors, among others. In results relevant to the study of orphan GPCRs (figure 3), HEK293 cells contain high message levels of GPR37, 2 types of orphan-LGR (glycoprotein hormone) receptors--LGR4 and LGR5, GPR39--and very high levels of the melatonin-related receptor GPR50. HEK293 cells may therefore be suitable tools for deorphanization of these receptors. Interestingly, HEK293 cells contain relatively little mRNA for Class B GPCRs with known ligands (figure 4A), but quite high levels of many orphan Class B GPCRs. The same is true for Class C GPCRs as seen in figure 4B though they do appear to contain high levels of GABABR1 receptor message, though lacking mRNA for GABABR2, necessary to form a fully functional GABA-B receptor. Finally, for GPCRs, HEK293 cells contain a number of types of frizzled receptors as well as smoothened receptor (figure 4C). Figures 5 and 6 show the mRNA levels of various types of GPCR signaling-related gene products such as the G proteins and a number of their targets and downstream effectors as well as proteins that regulate GPCR signaling, the GRK, beta-arrestin (ARRB) and RGS proteins. Interestingly HEK293 cells express mRNA for numerous isoforms of adenylyl cyclase and protein kinases A and C (PRKA, PRKC) and phospholipase C (PLC), while having a limited diversity of phospholipase A (PLA) and RGS proteins. HEK293 cells also appear to have an almost full complement of G protein isoforms for each subunit, making these cells an attractive environment to express any number of GPCRs to study downstream G protein-mediated signaling.

Figure 1

mRNA expression levels of Class A GPCRs. Microarray analysis of mRNA levels of Class A GPCRs with known ligands for HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 cell lines. The gray line indicates the threshold of statistical significance and the dark bars are proteins for which statistically significant levels of mRNA were detected. White bars indicate levels of mRNA for proteins that were present, but did not reach statistical significance. Abbreviation: 5-HT = 5-hydroxytryptamine; GNRH = Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone.

Figure 2

mRNA expression levels of Class A GPCRs. Microarray analysis of mRNA levels of Class A GPCRs with known ligands for HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 cell lines. The gray line indicates the threshold of statistical significance and the dark bars are proteins for which statistically significant levels of mRNA were detected. White bars indicate levels of mRNA for proteins that were present, but did not reach statistical significance. Abbreviation: MCH = Melanin-concentrating hormone; TRH = Thyrotropin-releasing hormone.

Figure 3

mRNA expression levels of Class A Orphan GPCRs. Microarray analysis of mRNA levels of Class A GPCRs with unknown ligands for HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 cell lines. The gray line indicates the threshold of statistical significance and the dark bars are proteins for which statistically significant levels of mRNA were detected. White bars indicate levels of mRNA for proteins that were present, but did not reach statistical significance. Abbreviation: ND = not determined.

Figure 4

mRNA expression levels of Class B, C, and F/S GPCRs. Microarray analysis of mRNA levels of GPCRs with known ligands for HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 cell lines. A: Class B GPCRs. B: Class C GPCRs. C: Class F/S GPCRs. The gray lines indicate the threshold of statistical significance and the dark bars are proteins for which statistically significant levels of mRNA were detected. White bars indicate levels of mRNA for proteins that were present, but did not reach statistical significance. Abbreviations: BAI = Brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor; CELSR = Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor; CRF = Corticotropin-releasing factor; ND = Not determined; PACAP = pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating polypeptide; VIP = Vasoactive intestinal peptide.

Figure 5

mRNA expression analysis of GPCR related signaling proteins. Microarray analysis of mRNA levels of GPCR related signaling proteins for HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 cell lines. The gray lines indicate the threshold of statistical significance and the dark bars are proteins for which statistically significant levels of mRNA were detected. White bars indicate levels of mRNA for proteins that were present, but did not reach statistical significance. Abbreviations: GRK = GPCR Kinase; PKA = Protein kinase A; PKC = Protein kinase C.

Figure 6

mRNA expression analysis of GPCR related signaling proteins. Microarray analysis of mRNA levels of GPCR related signaling proteins for HEK293, AtT20, BV2 and N18 cell lines. The gray lines indicate the threshold of statistical significance and the dark bars are proteins for which statistically significant levels of mRNA were detected. White bars indicate levels of mRNA for proteins that were present, but did not reach statistical significance. Abbreviations: ND = Not determined; PLA = Phospolipase A; PLC = Phospholipase C; PLD = Phospholipase D; RGS = Regulator of G protein signaling.

Next we analyzed the AtT20 cell line, a neuroendocrine line derived from a mouse pituitary tumor that has neuron-like properties [29]. This cell line is often used as a model neuroendocrine cell line and has been a useful cell line to study of ion channel modulation by GPCRs [18, 30, 31]. Unlike HEK293 cells, there has been relatively little work performed to identify the GPCRs and related signaling molecules present in AtT20 cells. Our current results highlight that AtT20 cells express a diverse range of GPCR mRNAs. Figures 1 and 2 show that they possess a number of types of Class A receptors with a few isoforms of each type. According to our analysis here, they express a few different isoforms of adenosine, chemokine, dopamine, neuropeptide FF, prostanoid and somatostatin receptors with a number of other individual members from other types. Figure 3 shows that AtT20 cells have a limited breadth of Class A orphan GPCRs. In Class B, AtT20 cells express mRNA for a number of glucagon, orphan brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor (BAI), and orphan latrophilin receptors (figure 4A). Like HEK293 cells, AtT20 cells express mRNA for GABABR1 (with a detectable, but not significant level of GABABR2 mRNA), but unlike HEK293s they express several metabotropic glutamate receptor genes (figure 4B). For Class F/S in AtT20s we detected mRNA for six frizzled receptors but not smoothened receptor mRNA (figure 4C). AtT20's have a somewhat sparser repertoire of GPCR signaling-related gene products than HEK293s, especially within the G protein subunits (figures 5 and 6).

We next examined BV2 cells, a cell line that is often used as a model system for the study of microglial function [32]. As shown in figures 1 and 2, BV2 cells predominately possess mRNA for anaphylatoxin, chemokine, and prostanoid Class A GPCRs as would be expected from an immune system-derived cell line. They also express mRNA for a scattering of other receptor types, such as a few muscarinic, somatostatin, and lipid receptors, among others. As has been reported in the literature, BV2 cells express CB2 cannabinoid receptors (Cnr2) [33], which makes them unique among the other cell lines examined here. We also observed the expression of a large number of different Class A orphan GPCR mRNAs as seen in figure 3, though a much less diverse repertoire of orphans from Class B (figure 4A) or Class C (figure 4B) receptors were present. BV2 cells express only one Class C GPCR at a significant, albeit, low mRNA level: the metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR1 (Grm1). Figure 4C shows that BV2 cells possess mRNA for a few different types of frizzled receptors as well as the smoothened receptor. BV2 cells have a wide complement of GPCR signaling-related gene products (figures 5 and 6). Though not quite as extensive as HEK293 cells, BV2 cells possess numerous isoforms of different phospholipases, PKA, PKC, and adenylyl cyclase. Their beta-arrestin, RGS protein, and GRK levels suggest the capacity to highly regulate GPCR signaling as well.

Lastly we investigated the N18 cell line. This cell line is derived from a neuroblastoma and is commonly employed as a neuron-like cell line. It has been used as a tool to analyze ion channel function in response to toxins and other regulators [19, 3437]. We found that N18 cells have mRNA for a broad range of different Class A GPCRs as seen in figures 1 and 2. N18 cells have mRNA for a few types of muscarinic acetylcholine, adenosine, chemokine, neuropeptides, prostanoids, protease-activated, and somatostatin receptors with a few other individual types such as CB1 cannabinoid receptors (Cnr1). Like the BV2 cells, N18 cells have mRNA for quite a few Class A orphan GPCRs (figure 3) with a similar profile as well. They further express mRNA for a broad complement of Class B GPCRs (figure 4A) but express a limited profile of Class C GPCRs (figure 4B). They also have mRNA for a number of different types of frizzled receptors, but lack mRNA for a smoothened receptor (figure 4C). N18 cells express high levels of many of the GPCR signaling-related gene products. They have abundant levels of G proteins and numerous isoforms of PKA. N18 cells' GPCRs are also presumably tightly regulated based on the assortment of GRK, RGS and beta-arrestin mRNAs detected (figures 5 and 6).

In order to validate our findings with the microarray analyses, we performed quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis on these four cell lines. We chose a range of GPCRs, mostly orphan receptors (Cnr1, Cnr2, Gpr3, Gpr12, Gpr35, Gpr83, and Gpr119), as well as two phospholipases (Plcb1 and Plcb4) as candidates to measure their mRNA levels using this alternative method. We selected genes that had distinct and differential expression profiles across the four cell lines. The data are plotted in figure 7 in a manner that correlates the copy number of mRNAs measured in each cell line using qPCR with the levels of mRNA determined from our microarray experiments. The qPCR data were broadly consistent with our microarray data. We observed higher copy numbers for all genes for which we had observed statistically significant microarray expression, suggesting an overall good correlation between our microarray and qPCR data. The qPCR did detect mRNA for a few genes whose levels of expression did not reach statistical significance in the microarray analyses. These genes are Plcb4, Gpr3, and Gpr92 in AtT20 cells and Plcb1, Gpr83 and Gpr92 in N18 cells.

Figure 7

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction validation of microarray analysis. Quantitative PCR analysis of 10 genes from (A) HEK293, (B) AtT20, (C) BV2, and (D) N18 cell lines. mRNA levels determined from qPCR analysis were plotted against the mRNA levels measured in the microarray analyses in figures 1, 3 and 6. The dashed lines indicate the threshold of statistical significance for the microarray data. Points that fall between 0 and this threshold indicate genes that were detected with the microarray analysis but failed to meet statistical significance. Lower critical threshold (Ct) values indicate high mRNA copy numbers.


The ability to induce expression of a known protein in a model cellular system, such as the cell lines analyzed here, has served as a remarkable, vital tool. However, the GPCR research community that makes use of these cell lines has had only limited data on the complement of GPCRs and related signaling machinery expressed in them. When a cell line is used for heterologous expression, ignorance of the endogenous protein expression profile of a cell line may lead to false conclusions about the nature of receptor function. Indeed, the cellular milieu can have a dramatic impact on GPCR signaling (see [22]. Microarray technology is now sufficiently accessible and mature to determine the mRNA expression for cell lines from species whose genomes have been sequenced. Yet even where microarray studies have been conducted, their data remains only nominally accessible to those with sufficient means, experience and time to extract useful information. The absence of a systematic published study of mRNA expression for signaling proteins of general interest hinders research using these important cell lines. This study provides data examining the presence of several hundred different GPCRs and related signaling proteins in four phenotypically diverse cell lines frequently used in GPCR research.

HEK293 cells are perhaps the most widely used cell line, cited in over four thousand publications and initial work has identified a number of endogenous receptors (see below). We expanded upon this knowledge by demonstrating that HEK293 cells express at least 75 different GPCR mRNAs. Much of what has been reported about GPCR mRNA expression patterns in HEK293 cells was confirmed by our analysis: ADORA2B, CHRM3, F2R, F2RL1, GABABR1, GPCR5A, GPR19, LGR5, LPAR1, LPAR2, P2YR1, PTGER2, S1PR, and SSTR5 [17, 26, 3846]. HEK293 cells have been reported to possess mRNA for a number of receptors that were not found to be expressed at statistically significant levels in our study: 5HT1D, 5HT6, 5HT7, ADRA2(a-c), ADRAB2, AGTR1, BDKRB2, DRD2, GPR1, GPR161, GRM4, P2YR2 and SSTR2 [17, 26, 4650]. Our results also indicate that HEK293 cells express mRNA for most G protein subunit isoforms, and numerous isoforms of adenylyl cyclase, protein kinases A and C, and phospholipase C. In addition they are useful for studying regulation of G protein mediated signaling as significant levels of mRNA for beta-arrestin1 and 2, GRK3-5 and a number of RGS subtypes were seen.

Much less is known of the expression patterns of GPCRs in AtT20 cells. We confirmed the presence of Sstr1 and Sstr2 mRNA in AtT20 cells [30], but did not observe significant levels of any of the other receptors that have previously been reported such as Chrm4 [51], Vipr1a, Adcyap1r1, or Sstr5 [30, 52, 53]. The lack of significant levels of CRF receptor mRNA was of interest as AtT20 cells have been reported to be sensitive to CRF [54]. mRNA for Hrh3 or Hrh4 histamine receptors were not detectable, despite reports of their presence [55, 56], but a low level of Hrh2 was found. Tacr1 [31] was not detected, nor were Tacr2 and Tacr3. We also did not detect the orphan Cmkor1/Cxcr7 [57]. It is worth noting that there are at least two AtT20 clones available and this may explain some of the differences we found. Generally speaking, AtT20 cells possess a much less diverse complement of GPCR-related signaling and regulatory gene products than the other cell lines tested. Of the approximately 120 GPCR signaling gene products that we studied here, AtT20 cells had 45 significantly expressed signaling related proteins compared to 72 or more in each of the 3 other cell lines. AtT20 cells were the only ones to not have significant levels of beta-arrestin1 (Arrb1) or GRK3-5. Only three RGS gene products were found at significantly high levels: Rgs14, Rgs20, and Snx13.

BV2 cells are commonly used to study microglial biology. These cells exist in a continuum between two states: a resting state and an activated state. For example, upon interferon gamma treatment (primed state), BV2 cells increase both Cnr2 and Gpr55 mRNA levels, whereas with lipopolysaccharide treatment (activated state) these levels decrease [58]. In our case, BV2 cells were cultured under conditions expected to promote a resting state. We can confirm that as reported in the literature BV2 cells express Adora3 [59], Cnr2 [33, 58], Mtnr1a [60], Galr2 [61], Ccr5, Cxcr3 [62] and Rgs2, 10, 12 [27, 28, 63]. We also detected mRNA for receptors that have been reported to be upregulated in response to stimulation such as Ccrl2 [28, 64], Ptafr, Ptigr [64] and Rgs7 [65]. Here, too, we identified a few receptors that have been reported present for which we found levels of mRNA below the levels that we defined as statistically significant: Hcrtr1 [66], Gpr55 [58] and the receptor for Cx3cr1 [67]. We did not detect Prokr1 which is upregulated with activation [27], nor for Oprm1, P2ry1 and Gpr149 which are downregulated following activation [27, 28]. Several reports have identified the presence of mGluRs in BV2 and primary microglia [21, 68, 69]. Interestingly, Grm1 is generally thought not to be present in BV2 cells, yet it was the only one that we significantly detected. We did find low, non-significant levels of Grm3, 6, and 8. The differences may be due to differences in the activation state of the cell lines. BV2 cells appear have a diverse receptor and signaling gene product profile.

Of the cell lines tested, the least well characterized is the N18 neuroblastoma line. They are known to express Cnr1 [70], which we confirmed with our analysis. It has been reported by some that they do not express muscarinic receptors [71], but our analysis shows that they have mRNA for three different types (Chrm2, 3, and 4) consistent with other reports [72, 73]. These studies also found evidence for secretin, prostacyclin, opioid and alpha2-adrenergic receptors In support of this we found significantly high levels of mRNA for Ptgir1, Ptger1, Ptger3, Ptger4, Oprd1, Oprl1 and Adra2b. There were also levels of mRNA for Sctr, Adra2a, Oprk1 and Oprm1 that did not reach statistical significance. Another report describes P2ry2 expression [74], but for this we only found low non-significant levels. Beyond these reports there seems to be little known of GPCR signaling in this cell line and this analysis substantially extends our knowledge of its complement of GPCR expression, at least at the mRNA level. Like BV2 cells, N18 cells appear to have a large repertoire of GPCRs, effectors, and regulating proteins, being consistently one of the highest expressers in each receptor class analyzed.

Interestingly, even the most prolific cell line expressed only a small portion of the full repertoire of non-chemosensory GPCRs (~360). Of these four cell types, BV2 cells expressed the highest total number of GPCRs (108) followed by N18 (105), AtT20 (79), and HEK293 cells (73). BV2 cells had the greatest total abundance of Class A receptors (88), but had equal numbers of Class A orphan GPCRs as N18 cells (figure 3). On the other hand, HEK293 cells have mRNA for the greater number of Class B and Class C orphans (figure 4). It is interesting that the BV2 and the N18 cell lines, which are more often used as models for specific cell types, express mRNA for the most diverse set of receptors. This presumably results in a greater sensitivity to a broad spectrum of ligands and the large number of signaling proteins for which we measured high mRNA levels in these two cell lines attest to this. It is also of interest that HEK293 and AtT20 cells have the lowest numbers of GPCRs of these four lines. Low expression (both of amount and type) may allow these cell lines to serve as a better-differentiated cell model, and, from an experimental perspective, may make a given cell line more attractive as a 'clean slate' into which gene products of interest can be introduced.

mRNA expression levels do not guarantee that a specific mRNA is properly translated, folded, and trafficked to produce functional protein. Discrepancies between our findings and those that have been reported using PCR-based methods may be due to differences that appear in cell lines with time, passage number and growth conditions. Discrepancies may also be attributed to the PCR-based techniques generally employed to extract and amplify mRNA: in some cases the techniques used in many of the studies cited here, some of which do not allow for relative quantification, may have detected very low levels of receptor mRNA that did not reach our threshold for statistical significance. In light of the potential discrepancies between microarray and PCR-based techniques, we employed qPCR analysis to test the validity of our microarray results (figure 7). The overall consistency between our qPCR results and microarray data lend confidence to the concept that the microarray analyses accurately reflect the presence of mRNA for these GPCRs and their signaling proteins.


In conclusion, this microarray analysis of the nearly full complement of non-chemosensory GPCRs and related signaling proteins in these four cell lines greatly expands our understanding of their potential signaling repertoire. These cell lines are used frequently as models of specific cell types, in heterologous expression, and as controls for antibody screening. The present work provides accessible profiles of mRNA expression that we hope will assist investigators of the GPCR superfamily in choosing the appropriate cell line to study a particular GPCR or related protein of interest and further to better understand potential functional interactions between GPCRs and related proteins in these lines. It is our hope that this work can eventually be extended to other commonly used cell lines such as CHO and COS7 cells when their host genomes (in this case hamster and green monkey, respectively) have been sequenced and made available for gene microarray analysis.


Cell cultures

Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) (catalog #CRL-1573) and AtT20 (catalog #CRL-1795) cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Boston, MA). BV2 microglia cells were obtained from Dr. Nephi Stella (University of Washington) [32, 33]. N18 neuroblastoma cells were obtained from Dr. William Catterall (University of Washington)[75]. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), penicillin, streptomycin, and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco Life Technologies (Rockville, MD). All cell lines were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS, 100 units ml-1 penicillin, and 100 μg ml-1 streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified air. Importantly, BV2 cells were maintained in conditions that push BV2 cells towards a resting, non-activated state.

Cell preparation, mRNA extraction & microarray analysis

Hybridization and sample imaging/quantification was performed by Indiana University's Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics. To study mouse and human mRNA expression, we used Nimblegen 4 × 72 k arrays (NCBI MM8, and NCBI HG18, respectively; 60 mer probe lengths). These are four-plex arrays that allow for the examination of mRNA expression of ~20,000 genes from four samples. The layout provides for three probes per target, the values of which we averaged to obtain a sample value. We cultured four 10 cm plates of each cell line, performing separate extractions when the cells grew to confluence. Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) under RNase-free conditions, followed by chloroform treatment (100 ul/ml). After centrifugation, the aqueous phase containing total RNA is then extracted and treated with isopropanol (500 uL/mL) for 5-10 mins. After centrifugation, the RNA pellet was isolated, washed with ethanol (75%; 1 ml/1 mL of reagent solution), followed by another centrifugation and air-dried. The RNA pellet was resuspended in RNase-free water. Total RNA quantity was assessed using NanoDrop ND-1000, and the Bioanalyzer 2100 determined the 28S/18S ratio for quality assessment. To synthesize targets for hybridization, we began with 10.0 μg of total RNA and used Invitrogen's SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis kit using oligo (dT) primer (Promega) followed by DNA labeling using 1 O.D. CY3-labeled random nonamer primer (TriLink Biotechnologies) and 100 U Klenow fragment 3' > 5' exo-(NEB) per 1.0 μg double-stranded cDNA. Single-color hybridization, post-hybridization washing and scanning were done with NimbleGen reagents and according to the NimbleGen's User's Guide for Expression Analysis. Images were acquired using a GenePix 4200A scanner with GenePix 6.0 software. The data from these arrays were extracted using the software NimbleScan 2.4 (Roche NimbleGen) and processed into PAIR files.

We used two separate NimbleGen high-density arrays for expression analysis (design name = HG18 60 mer expr 4plex and design name = MM8 60 mer expr X4). The 4-plex arrays each consisted of 4 × 72,000 isothermal long-oligo nucleotide probes that are 60 nucleotides in length. The first was based on HG18, Build 36 version from NCBI of Homo sapiens gene catalog, which represented 24,000 protein-encoding genes with 3 probes per target and 1 replicate, and the second was MM8 version from NCBI of Mus musculus gene catalog, which represented 18,869 protein-encoding genes with 3 probes per target and 1 replicate.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis

Primers for selected GPCRs and enzymes were designed using Primer-Blast ( The mouse gene was used as template in the primer design, and either mouse or human genome was used to screen for non-specific targets. Suitable primers were determined in this way and were commercially produced (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa). AtT20, BV-2, HEK293 and N18 cell lines were grown on 10 cm dishes until each monolayer was 50-95% confluent. Total RNA was prepared and reverse transcribed using a Retroscript Kit as per manufacturer's protocol (Cat# AM1710; Ambion Inc. Austin, Texas). Two micrograms of total RNA from each line was reverse transcribed, samples were diluted and qPCR was performed using a Stratagene Mx3000P thermocycler and Sybr Green/Low Rox polymerase mix (Cat.# 95056-100, Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD). In the case of N18, the "no RT" control showed significant genomic DNA contamination. To compensate for this, the total RNA for this sample was treated with DNase 1 for 1 hour and again purified just prior to RT. Primers for glutaraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) were used to make an internal control for each cell line with the threshold cycle set at 16. Once the standard critical threshold (Ct) was set, the relative expression levels for genes within each cell line were determined.

Database information

All data is MIAME compliant and has been deposited in GEO (accession number GSE25901).

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of the microarray data, we first transformed the values from the microarray into log2 format for ease of comparison and data representation [76]. We then obtained values for 10-11 assorted seminal proteins that were unlikely to be expressed in these cell lines. For the human-derived HEK293 cells these were: PYY2, PSP94, SPATA3, SPATA4, SPATA5, SPATA13, SPATS1, SPESP1, SPERT, ODF1, and SPAM1. For the three murine cell lines we selected: Svs2, Svs3, Svs5, Svs6, Svs7, Sva, Svp2, Sval1, Sval2, Sval3. We averaged the expression level of each of these proteins for each of the four plates to determine the mean and standard deviation of their expression. We took these mean values to represent zero expression. To determine statistically significant expression, we added the mean plus two standard deviations of the expression levels of these seminal proteins for each plate. We then subtracted this value from the value for each receptor and protein for which we obtained a signal. The mean plus two standard deviations was considered to be the baseline for our proteins of interest as any values at this level or higher would be considered statistically significant (95% confidence that the true mean of the seminal protein expression would fall within the mean plus two standard deviations). Thus any protein remaining with a positive expression value is considered to be significantly expressed [76]. All graphs and statistical analyses were generated using GraphPad Prism 4.0 software (Hearne Scientific Software, Chicago, IL).



corticotropin releasing factor


Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium


fetal bovine serum


G Protein Coupled Receptor


G protein coupled receptor kinase


Human Embryonic Kidney


metabotropic glutamate receptor


polymerase chain reaction


Regulator of G protein signaling.


  1. 1.

    Levoye A, Dam J, Ayoub MA, Guillaume JL, Jockers R: Do orphan G-protein-coupled receptors have ligand-independent functions? New insights from receptor heterodimers. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7 (11): 1094-1098. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400838.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jacoby E, Bouhelal R, Gerspacher M, Seuwen K: The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family. ChemMedChem. 2006, 1 (8): 761-782. 10.1002/cmdc.200600134.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Davies MN, Secker A, Freitas AA, Mendao M, Timmis J, Flower DR: On the hierarchical classification of G protein-coupled receptors. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (23): 3113-3118. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm506.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Davies MN, Gloriam DE, Secker A, Freitas AA, Mendao M, Timmis J, Flower DR: Proteomic applications of automated GPCR classification. Proteomics. 2007, 7 (16): 2800-2814. 10.1002/pmic.200700093.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Davies MN, Secker A, Halling-Brown M, Moss DS, Freitas AA, Timmis J, Clark E, Flower DR: GPCRTree: online hierarchical classification of GPCR function. BMC Res Notes. 2008, 1: 67-10.1186/1756-0500-1-67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kolakowski LF: GCRDb: a G-protein-coupled receptor database. Receptors Channels. 1994, 2 (1): 1-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Horn F, Bettler E, Oliveira L, Campagne F, Cohen FE, Vriend G: GPCRDB information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (1): 294-297. 10.1093/nar/gkg103.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bockaert J, Marin P, Dumuis A, Fagni L: The 'magic tail' of G protein-coupled receptors: an anchorage for functional protein networks. FEBS Lett. 2003, 546 (1): 65-72. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00453-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Brink CB, Harvey BH, Bodenstein J, Venter DP, Oliver DW: Recent advances in drug action and therapeutics: relevance of novel concepts in G-protein-coupled receptor and signal transduction pharmacology. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004, 57 (4): 373-387. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02046.x.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pluder F, Morl K, Beck-Sickinger AG: Proteome analysis to study signal transduction of G protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 2006, 112 (1): 1-11. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.03.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Eglen RM: Emerging concepts in GPCR function--the influence of cell phenotype on GPCR pharmacology. Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 2005, 48: 31-34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hall RA, Lefkowitz RJ: Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling by scaffold proteins. Circ Res. 2002, 91 (8): 672-680. 10.1161/01.RES.0000037000.74258.03.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tobin AB, Butcher AJ, Kong KC: Location, location, GPCR phosphorylation offers a mechanism for cell-type-specific signalling. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008, 29 (8): 413-420. 10.1016/

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hollinger S, Hepler JR: Cellular regulation of RGS proteins: modulators and integrators of G protein signaling. Pharmacol Rev. 2002, 54 (3): 527-559. 10.1124/pr.54.3.527.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hague C, Bernstein LS, Ramineni S, Chen Z, Minneman KP, Hepler JR: Selective inhibition of alpha1A-adrenergic receptor signaling by RGS2 association with the receptor third intracellular loop. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (29): 27289-27295. 10.1074/jbc.M502365200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wise A, Gearing K, Rees S: Target validation of G-protein coupled receptors. Drug Discov Today. 2002, 7 (4): 235-246. 10.1016/S1359-6446(01)02131-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Thomas P, Smart TG: HEK293 cell line: a vehicle for the expression of recombinant proteins. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2005, 51 (3): 187-200. 10.1016/j.vascn.2004.08.014.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mackie K, Lai Y, Westenbroek R, Mitchell R: Cannabinoids activate an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance and inhibit Q-type calcium currents in AtT20 cells transfected with rat brain cannabinoid receptor. J Neurosci. 1995, 15 (10): 6552-6561.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mackie K, Devane WA, Hille B: Anandamide, an endogenous cannabinoid, inhibits calcium currents as a partial agonist in N18 neuroblastoma cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1993, 44 (3): 498-503.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Choi Y, Lim SY, Jeong HS, Koo KA, Sung SH, Kim YC: Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of apoptosis induced by 15-methoxypinusolidic acid in microglial BV2 cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2009, 157 (6): 1053-1064. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00247.x.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Loane DJ, Stoica BA, Pajoohesh-Ganji A, Byrnes KR, Faden AI: Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 modulates microglial reactivity and neurotoxicity by inhibiting NADPH oxidase. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284 (23): 15629-15639. 10.1074/jbc.M806139200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Aramori I, Ferguson SS, Bieniasz PD, Zhang J, Cullen B, Cullen MG: Molecular mechanism of desensitization of the chemokine receptor CCR-5: receptor signaling and internalization are dissociable from its role as an HIV-1 co-receptor. EMBO J. 1997, 16 (15): 4606-4616. 10.1093/emboj/16.15.4606.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Feniger-Barish R, Ran M, Zaslaver A, Ben-Baruch A: Differential modes of regulation of cxc chemokine-induced internalization and recycling of human CXCR1 and CXCR2. Cytokine. 1999, 11 (12): 996-1009. 10.1006/cyto.1999.0510.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Clark MC, Baro DJ: Arthropod D2 receptors positively couple with cAMP through the Gi/o protein family. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2007, 146 (1): 9-19. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2006.08.018.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pandi-Perumal SR, Trakht I, Srinivasan V, Spence DW, Maestroni GJ, Zisapel N, Cardinali DP: Physiological effects of melatonin: role of melatonin receptors and signal transduction pathways. Prog Neurobiol. 2008, 85 (3): 335-353. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.04.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Shaw G, Morse S, Ararat M, Graham FL: Preferential transformation of human neuronal cells by human adenoviruses and the origin of HEK 293 cells. FASEB J. 2002, 16 (8): 869-871.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sohn SH, Chung HS, Ko E, Jeong HJ, Kim SH, Jeong JH, Kim Y, Shin M, Hong M, Bae H: The genome-wide expression profile of Nelumbinis semen on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated BV-2 microglial cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009, 32 (6): 1012-1020. 10.1248/bpb.32.1012.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Thomas DM, Francescutti-Verbeem DM, Kuhn DM: Gene expression profile of activated microglia under conditions associated with dopamine neuronal damage. FASEB J. 2006, 20 (3): 515-517.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tooze J, Hollinshead M, Fuller SD, Tooze SA, Huttner WB: Morphological and biochemical evidence showing neuronal properties in AtT-20 cells and their growth cones. Eur J Cell Biol. 1989, 49 (2): 259-273.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sarret P, Nouel D, Dal Farra C, Vincent JP, Beaudet A, Mazella J: Receptor-mediated internalization is critical for the inhibition of the expression of growth hormone by somatostatin in the pituitary cell line AtT-20. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (27): 19294-19300. 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19294.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Winkler A, Papsdorf G, Odarjuk J, Siems WE, Fickel J, Melzig MF: Expression and characterization of the substance P (NK1) receptor in the rat pituitary and AtT20 mouse pituitary tumor cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995, 291 (1): 51-55. 10.1016/0922-4106(95)90188-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Blasi E, Barluzzi R, Bocchini V, Mazzolla R, Bistoni F: Immortalization of murine microglial cells by a v-raf/v-myc carrying retrovirus. J Neuroimmunol. 1990, 27 (2-3): 229-237. 10.1016/0165-5728(90)90073-V.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Franklin A, Stella N: Arachidonylcyclopropylamide increases microglial cell migration through cannabinoid CB2 and abnormal-cannabidiol-sensitive receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003, 474 (2-3): 195-198. 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)02074-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vieira LB, Kushmerick C, Hildebrand ME, Garcia E, Stea A, Cordeiro MN, Richardson M, Gomez MV, Snutch TP: Inhibition of high voltage-activated calcium channels by spider toxin PnTx3-6. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005, 314 (3): 1370-1377. 10.1124/jpet.105.087023.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Carlson RO, Masco D, Brooker G, Spiegel S: Endogenous ganglioside GM1 modulates L-type calcium channel activity in N18 neuroblastoma cells. J Neurosci. 1994, 14 (4): 2272-2281.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kirsch GE, Skattebol A, Possani LD, Brown AM: Modification of Na channel gating by an alpha scorpion toxin from Tityus serrulatus. J Gen Physiol. 1989, 93 (1): 67-83. 10.1085/jgp.93.1.67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yang J: Ion permeation through 5-hydroxytryptamine-gated channels in neuroblastoma N18 cells. J Gen Physiol. 1990, 96 (6): 1177-1198. 10.1085/jgp.96.6.1177.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Alderton F, Sambi B, Tate R, Pyne NJ, Pyne S: Assessment of agonism at G-protein coupled receptors by phosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidic acid in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2001, 134 (1): 6-9. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704278.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cooper J, Hill SJ, Alexander SP: An endogenous A2B adenosine receptor coupled to cyclic AMP generation in human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1997, 122 (3): 546-550. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701401.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Estacion M, Li S, Sinkins WG, Gosling M, Bahra P, Poll C, Westwick J, Schilling WP: Activation of human TRPC6 channels by receptor stimulation. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (21): 22047-22056. 10.1074/jbc.M402320200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mundell SJ, Matharu AL, Kelly E, Benovic JL: Arrestin isoforms dictate differential kinetics of A2B adenosine receptor trafficking. Biochemistry. 2000, 39 (42): 12828-12836. 10.1021/bi0010928.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mundell SJ, Loudon RP, Benovic JL: Characterization of G protein-coupled receptor regulation in antisense mRNA-expressing cells with reduced arrestin levels. Biochemistry. 1999, 38 (27): 8723-8732. 10.1021/bi990361v.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Schmidt M, Nehls C, Rumenapp U, Jakobs KH: m3 Muscarinic receptor-induced and Gi-mediated heterologous potentiation of phospholipase C stimulation: role of phosphoinositide synthesis. Mol Pharmacol. 1996, 50 (4): 1038-1046.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Siehler S, Wang Y, Fan X, Windh RT, Manning DR: Sphingosine 1-phosphate activates nuclear factor-kappa B through Edg receptors. Activation through Edg-3 and Edg-5, but not Edg-1, in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (52): 48733-48739. 10.1074/jbc.M011072200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    van Koppen C, Meyer zu Heringdorf M, Laser KT, Zhang C, Jakobs KH, Bunemann M, Pott L: Activation of a high affinity Gi protein-coupled plasma membrane receptor by sphingosine-1-phosphate. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (4): 2082-2087. 10.1074/jbc.271.4.2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Werry TD, Christie MI, Dainty IA, Wilkinson GF, Willars GB: Ca(2+) signalling by recombinant human CXCR2 chemokine receptors is potentiated by P2Y nucleotide receptors in HEK cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 135 (5): 1199-1208. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704566.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Daaka Y, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ: Switching of the coupling of the beta2-adrenergic receptor to different G proteins by protein kinase A. Nature. 1997, 390 (6655): 88-91. 10.1038/36362.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Dautzenberg FM, Higelin J, Teichert U: Functional characterization of corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor endogenously expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000, 390 (1-2): 51-59. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00915-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kaupmann K, Bruns C, Hoyer D, Seuwen K, Lubbert H: Distribution and second messenger coupling of four somatostatin receptor subtypes expressed in brain. FEBS Lett. 1993, 331 (1-2): 53-59. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80296-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kramarenko II, Bunni MA, Morinelli TA, Raymond JR, Garnovskaya MN: Identification of functional bradykinin B(2) receptors endogenously expressed in HEK293 cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009, 77 (2): 269-276. 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.09.027.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Jones SV: m4 muscarinic receptor subtype activates an inwardly rectifying potassium conductance in AtT20 cells. Neurosci Lett. 1992, 147 (2): 125-130. 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90576-S.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Aoki Y, Iwasaki Y, Katahira M, Oiso Y, Saito H: Regulation of the rat proopiomelanocortin gene expression in AtT-20 cells. II: Effects of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. Endocrinology. 1997, 138 (5): 1930-1934. 10.1210/en.138.5.1930.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Westendorf JM, Schonbrunn A: Peptide specificity for stimulation of corticotropin secretion: activation of overlapping pathways by the vasoactive intestinal peptide family and corticotropin-releasing factor. Endocrinology. 1985, 116 (6): 2528-2535. 10.1210/endo-116-6-2528.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Peeters PJ, Gohlmann HW, Van den Wyngaert I, Swagemakers SM, Bijnens L, Kass SU, Steckler T: Transcriptional response to corticotropin-releasing factor in AtT-20 cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2004, 66 (5): 1083-1092. 10.1124/mol.104.000950.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Clark MA, Korte A, Myers J, Egan RW: High affinity histamine H3 receptors regulate ACTH release by AtT-20 cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992, 210 (1): 31-35. 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90648-N.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Meng J, Ma X, Li M, Jia M, Luo X: Histamine H(4) receptors regulate ACTH release in AtT-20 cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008, 587 (1-3): 336-338. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.019.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yoshida D, Nomura R, Teramoto A: Signaling Pathway Mediated by CXCR7, an Alternative Chemokine Receptor for Stromal-Cell Derived Factor-1alpha, in AtT20 mouse ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma cells. J Neuroendocrinol. 2009, 21 (5): 481-488. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01867.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Pietr M, Kozela E, Levy R, Rimmerman N, Lin YH, Stella N, Vogel Z, Juknat A: Differential changes in GPR55 during microglial cell activation. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583 (12): 2071-2076. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.028.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lee JY, Jhun BS, Oh YT, Lee JH, Choe W, Baik HH, Ha J, Yoon KS, Kim SS, Kang I: Activation of adenosine A3 receptor suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha production through inhibition of PI 3-kinase/Akt and NF-kappaB activation in murine BV2 microglial cells. Neurosci Lett. 2006, 396 (1): 1-6. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.11.004.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jang MH, Jung SB, Lee MH, Kim CJ, Oh YT, Kang I, Kim J, Kim EH: Melatonin attenuates amyloid beta25-35-induced apoptosis in mouse microglial BV2 cells. Neurosci Lett. 2005, 380 (1-2): 26-31. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.01.003.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Su Y, Ganea D, Peng X, Jonakait GM: Galanin down-regulates microglial tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by a post-transcriptional mechanism. J Neuroimmunol. 2003, 134 (1-2): 52-60. 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00397-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kremlev SG, Roberts RL, Palmer C: Differential expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors during microglial activation and inhibition. J Neuroimmunol. 2004, 149 (1-2): 1-9. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.11.012.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lee JK, McCoy MK, Harms AS, Ruhn KA, Gold SJ, Tansey MG: Regulator of G-protein signaling 10 promotes dopaminergic neuron survival via regulation of the microglial inflammatory response. J Neurosci. 2008, 28 (34): 8517-8528. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1806-08.2008.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hwang SH, Choi YG, Jeong MY, Hong YM, Lee JH, Lim S: Microarray analysis of gene expression profile by treatment of Cinnamomi Ramulus in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated BV-2 cells. Gene. 2009, 443 (1-2): 83-90. 10.1016/j.gene.2009.04.024.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hausmann ON, Hu WH, Keren-Raifman T, Witherow DS, Wang Q, Levay K, Frydel B, V ZS, J RB: Spinal cord injury induces expression of RGS7 in microglia/macrophages in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2002, 15 (4): 602-612. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.01916.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Yang Y, Hahm E, Kim Y, Kang J, Lee W, Han I, Myung P, Kang H, Park H, Cho D: Regulation of IL-18 expression by CRH in mouse microglial cells. Immunol Lett. 2005, 98 (2): 291-296. 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.12.003.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Lauro C, Di Angelantonio S, Cipriani R, Sobrero F, Antonilli L, Brusadin V, Ragozzino D, Limatola C: Activity of adenosine receptors type 1 Is required for CX3CL1-mediated neuroprotection and neuromodulation in hippocampal neurons. J Immunol. 2008, 180 (11): 7590-7596.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Taylor DL, Jones F, Kubota ES, Pocock JM: Stimulation of microglial metabotropic glutamate receptor mGlu2 triggers tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced neurotoxicity in concert with microglial-derived Fas ligand. J Neurosci. 2005, 25 (11): 2952-2964. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4456-04.2005.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Taylor DL, Diemel LT, Pocock JM: Activation of microglial group III metabotropic glutamate receptors protects neurons against microglial neurotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2003, 23 (6): 2150-2160.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Felder CC, Briley EM, Axelrod J, Simpson JT, Mackie K, Devane WA: Anandamide, an endogenous cannabimimetic eicosanoid, binds to the cloned human cannabinoid receptor and stimulates receptor-mediated signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90 (16): 7656-7660. 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7656.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hanham CA, Zhao F, Tignor GH: Evidence from the anti-idiotypic network that the acetylcholine receptor is a rabies virus receptor. J Virol. 1993, 67 (1): 530-542.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Howlett AC, Fleming RM: Cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Pharmacology of the response in neuroblastoma cell membranes. Mol Pharmacol. 1984, 26 (3): 532-538.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Roth BL, Beinfeld MC, Howlett AC: Secretin receptors on neuroblastoma cell membranes: characterization of 125I-labeled secretin binding and association with adenylate cyclase. J Neurochem. 1984, 42 (4): 1145-1152. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1984.tb12723.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Rice WR, Burton FM, Fiedeldey DT: Cloning and expression of the alveolar type II cell P2u-purinergic receptor. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1995, 12 (1): 27-32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Amano T, Richelson E, Nirenberg M: Neurotransmitter synthesis by neuroblastoma clones (neuroblast differentiation-cell culture-choline acetyltransferase-acetylcholinesterase-tyrosine hydroxylase-axons-dendrites). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1972, 69 (1): 258-263. 10.1073/pnas.69.1.258.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Bono H, Yagi K, Kasukawa T, Nikaido I, Tominaga N, Miki R, Mizuno Y, Tomaru Y, Goto H, Nitanda H, et al: Systematic expression profiling of the mouse transcriptome using RIKEN cDNA microarrays. Genome Res. 2003, 13 (6B): 1318-1323. 10.1101/gr.1075103.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the NIH (grants DA11322, DA21696, DA24122, NIH/NCRR RR025761), the Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics at Indiana University and the Indiana METACyt Initiative of Indiana University, through a major grant from the Lilly Endowment, Inc.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Straiker.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

BKA carried out the drafting of the manuscript and the statistical analysis. JL performed the microarray analysis and assisted in drafting the manuscript. JWM performed the cell line preparation, mRNA extraction and qPCR experiments. KM participated in the design and coordination of the study. AS conceived of the study, participated in the design and coordination of the study, critical review of the manuscript, and performed the data extraction. All authors contributed to writing, reading, and approving the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atwood, B.K., Lopez, J., Wager-Miller, J. et al. Expression of G protein-coupled receptors and related proteins in HEK293, AtT20, BV2, and N18 cell lines as revealed by microarray analysis. BMC Genomics 12, 14 (2011).

Download citation


  • HEK293 Cell
  • AtT20 Cell
  • GPCR Signaling
  • Frizzle Receptor
  • Related Signaling Protein