- Research article
- Open Access
Gene expression in the brain and kidney of rainbow trout in response to handling stress
- Aleksei Krasnov1Email author,
- Heikki Koskinen†1,
- Petri Pehkonen†1,
- Caird E RexroadIII2,
- Sergey Afanasyev3 and
- Hannu Mölsä1
© Krasnov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 06 August 2004
- Accepted: 06 January 2005
- Published: 06 January 2005
Microarray technologies are rapidly becoming available for new species including teleost fishes. We constructed a rainbow trout cDNA microarray targeted at the identification of genes which are differentially expressed in response to environmental stressors. This platform included clones from normalized and subtracted libraries and genes selected through functional annotation. Present study focused on time-course comparisons of stress responses in the brain and kidney and the identification of a set of genes which are diagnostic for stress response.
Fish were stressed with handling and samples were collected 1, 3 and 5 days after the first exposure. Gene expression profiles were analysed in terms of Gene Ontology categories. Stress affected different functional groups of genes in the tissues studied. Mitochondria, extracellular matrix and endopeptidases (especially collagenases) were the major targets in kidney. Stress response in brain was characterized with dramatic temporal alterations. Metal ion binding proteins, glycolytic enzymes and motor proteins were induced transiently, whereas expression of genes involved in stress and immune response, cell proliferation and growth, signal transduction and apoptosis, protein biosynthesis and folding changed in a reciprocal fashion. Despite dramatic difference between tissues and time-points, we were able to identify a group of 48 genes that showed strong correlation of expression profiles (Pearson r > |0.65|) in 35 microarray experiments being regulated by stress. We evaluated performance of the clone sets used for preparation of microarray. Overall, the number of differentially expressed genes was markedly higher in EST than in genes selected through Gene Ontology annotations, however 63% of stress-responsive genes were from this group.
1. Stress responses in fish brain and kidney are different in function and time-course. 2. Identification of stress-regulated genes provides the possibility for measuring stress responses in various conditions and further search for the functionally related genes.
- Gene Ontology
- Rainbow Trout
- Metal Binding Protein
- Subtract cDNA Library
- Handling Stress
Until recently multiple gene expression profiling was applied almost exclusively to human and a few model organisms. At present cDNA microarrays are being constructed for new species including teleost fishes [1–6]. Since EST sequencing projects are carried out with a large number of species, continuous development of new platforms can be expected in the future. We designed a salmonid fish cDNA microarray primarily to characterize responses to stress, toxicity and pathogens. This paper focuses on time-course comparisons of stress responses in rainbow trout and the usage of functional annotation to conduct analyses of gene expression data.
Functional annotation of genes, especially Gene Ontology  is increasingly being used for analyses and interpretation of microarray results [8–13]. We applied Gene Ontology in several modes to facilitate implementation of our research tasks. Furthermore, experimental results generated guidelines for the development of specialized microarrays. Well designed platforms are expected to ensure identification of differentially expressed genes while containing representative coverage from important functional groups. Custom made microarrays include clones from cDNA libraries and/or selected genes, which have advantages and drawbacks. Indiscriminant spotting of EST may result in under representation of many functional classes. On the other hand selection of genes fully relies on annotations and hypotheses, which can be misleading and limit possibilities for nontrivial findings. We used clones from normalized and subtracted cDNA libraries as well as genes selected by the functional categories of Gene Ontology for inclusion onto a microarray targeted at characterizing transcriptome responses to environmental stressors. Designing a new platform requires balancing a large number of genes versus multiple replications of spots, which enhances statistical analyses of data. The rainbow trout microarray was prepared by spotting of relatively small number of genes (1300) in 6 replicates. We show that multiple replications combined with the dye-swap design of hybridization [14, 15] allows for accurate detection of relatively small alterations in expression levels, which is important for the functional interpretation of results.
Thematic associations in studies of fish stress. Computer-assisted analysis of 11129 Medline abstracts was performed as described in Methods. Terms that were over-represented in the abstracts (exact Fisher's test, P < 0.05) are ranked by the numbers of occurrence.
Terms (counts/1000 abstracts)
Salmonids (126.4), carp (68.9), eels (67.0), catfish (37.7), tilapia (38.7)
Toxicity (440.6), temperature (178.3), oxygen (91.5), confinement (52.8), salinity (46.2), hypoxia (54.7), diseases (20.8), crowding (23.6), acidosis (17.9), aggressiveness (11.3)
Cortisol (208.5), catecholamines (159.4), steroids (92.5)
Muscle (197.2), blood cells (152.9), pituitary (119.8), liver (123.6), epithelia (96.2), brain (90.6), kidney (89.6), heart (51.9), skin (42.5)
Cytosol (42.5), collagen (17.0), cytoskeleton (15.1), microsome (15.1), microtubule (14.2), lysosomes (13.2), peroxisome (4.7)
Glutathion (167.9), oxidant (93.4), antioxidant (90.6), peroxide (66.0), radical (55.7), superoxide (40.6), catalase (35.8), redox (18.9)
Immunity (91.5), secretion (80.2), metabolism (74), transport (56.6), defense (52.8), necrosis (28.3), apoptosis (18.9), phosphorylation (15.1), proteolysis (7.5)
Ion (987.7), iron (215.1), glucose (141.5), lactate (67.9), lipid (74.5), zinc (51.9), phospholipid (11.3), triglyceride (11.3), lipopolysaccharide (9.4)
Enzymes (180.2), heat-shock proteins (84.0), hemoglobin (37.7), metallothionein (37.7), transferase (32.1), phosphatase (26.4), chaperones (21.7), glutathion-S-transferase (17.0), transaminase (17.0), Na/K-ATPase (17.0), aminotransferase (8.5), mitogen-activated kinases (4.7)
1 Design of cDNA microarray
Presentation of the Gene Ontology functional categories in the microarray. Table shows the numbers and frequncies of genes in the clone sets that were used for spotting (SSH – subtracted libraries, EST – normalized libraries).
Gene Ontology classes
N on slide
Response to external stimulus
Response to stress
Humoral immune response
Intracellular signaling cascade
2 Stress response in the brain and kidney of rainbow trout
2.1 Differentially expressed genes
Rapid alteration of gene expression was a remarkable feature of stress response in the brain. Only one gene, aquaporin, was up-regulated for the duration of the experiment. Water channel aquaporin plays a key role in water homeostasis being implicated in various physiological processes and pathological conditions . A panel of genes which showed markedly increased expression after 1 day was also suppressed after 5 days. Surprisingly, this group included mainly genes that are predominantly expressed in skeletal or cardiac muscle (myosin light chain 1 and 2, skeletal and cardiac isoforms, myosin heavy chain, troponin I, T and C) or are involved in regulation of muscle contraction (parvalbumin alpha and sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase). An opposite tendency was shown by a large group of genes however the magnitude of expression changes was smaller. We analysed 5 differentially expressed genes with qPCR and the results were in close concordance with the microarray data (not shown).
2.2 Functional classes
Enrichment of Gene Ontology categories in the lists of differentially expressed genes. Analysis with exact Fisher's test, (p < 0.05) was made using the composition of microarray as a reference. The numbers of differentially expressed genes and genes on the microarray are in parentheses.
Intracellular signaling cascade (19/47)
RAS protein signal transduction (6/9)
Electron transporters (13/43)
GTPase mediated signal transduction (11/16)
Heat shock proteins (8/16)
Metal ion binding (31/80)
Zinc ion binding (8/24)
Potential-driven transporters (7/9)
Calcium ion binding (20/41)
Magnesium ion binding (8/14)
Microtubule-based process (6/6)
3 Stress-responsive genes
I Stress response in rainbow trout
Our study aimed at comparison of time-course of stress response in rainbow trout brain and kidney and finding of a diagnostic set of genes. These tasks were implemented with an aid of Gene Ontology annotation, which was used in several modes. The most straightforward and commonly used approach is counting of Gene Ontology classes in the lists of differentially expressed genes. Statistical inference of enrichment and depletion is made with Z-score of hypergeometric distribution, exact Fisher's test or its modifications. Such analyses helped us to interpret differences of stress responses in the brain and kidney (Table 3). In the brain handling stress mainly affected expression of transcripts for structural proteins (especially cytoskeleton), signal transduction, and binding of metal ions, whereas mitochondria, extracellular structures and peptidases appeared the key targets in the kidney. Computer-assisted analysis of Medline abstracts suggested that most of these themes have not been addressed in the studies of fish stress (Table 1).
Searches of the enriched Gene Ontology categories associated with differentially expressed transcripts is useful for rapid screens of microarray data; however, it presumes coordinated expression of functionally related genes. This assumption is not valid for many classes, especially large and heterogenous groups, such as stress and defense response. Because the gene composition of microarray is used as a reference, uneven presentation of functional categories can distort the results. Finally, this analysis does not take into account direction and magnitude of differential expression. To overcome these problems, enrichment of Gene Ontology classes is analysed in groups of genes with similar expression profiles revealed with cluster or factorial analyses. In this study we preferred straight comparison of Gene Ontology classes by the mean log expression ratios which helped in interpretation of the time-course of stress response.
In the kidney temporal alterations were relatively weak though significant. Expression of peptidases (especially collagenases) increased steadily, which implied possible degradation of tissue with prolonged stress. We could expect abrupt fluctuations in the rainbow trout brain, since transient induction and up-regulation of gene expression was observed in response to cold in the brain of channel catfish . In our study most differentially expressed genes fell into two groups with distinct temporal profiles which showed remarkable coherence of the functional classes. Early phase was associated with dramatic up-regulation of structural and metal binding proteins, which were repressed in later phases. Expression of genes involved in stress and defense response, apoptosis and signal transduction, cell cycle and growth changed in a reciprocal fashion. Activation of metal binding proteins could be accounted for the role of ions (particularly calcium) in multiple pathways of gene expression regulation in the brain . Motor proteins of cytoskeleton play key roles in the transport of vesicles and the establishment and rearrangement of neuronal networks [27–29] which also could be implicated to the stress response in fish. However, in mammals these functions are associated with non-muscle isoforms and therefore differential expression of the sarcomeric proteins was unexpected. Additional experiments confirmed induction of these proteins at early phase of stress response. Previously we observed high activity of skeletal α-actin and myosin light chain 2 promoters in the neural tissues of rainbow trout embryos . Sequencing of salmonid fish cDNA libraries provided evidence for the brain expression of sarcomeric proteins, but their role remains fully unknown. At present there is sparse evidence for differential expression of structural muscle proteins in the mammalian brain. For example regulation of troponin I with dextromethorphan (antagonist of excitatory amino acid receptors) was reported in the rat hyppocampus and cortex .
Grouping of individual differentially expressed genes by the functional classes reduced noise and enhanced cluster and factorial analyses. This helped to identify stress-responsive genes that showed correlated expression in 35 microarray experiments (22 experiments are shown in Figure 5A). Association with stress is well established for most of these proteins and some are used as stress markers. The list of enriched Gene Ontology categories (stress, defense and humoral immune response, signal transduction and response to oxidative stress, p < 0.05) suggested biological relevance of this group. Computer analysis of Medline abstracts (Table 1) showed that immunity and metabolism of reactive oxidative species are prioritized in studies of fish stress and these functional categories were enriched in the list of stress-responsive genes. Thus Gene Ontology provided a useful starting point for search of functionally related genes and results of these analyses can be used further for the revision of annotations.
2 Construction of microarrays
Results of our experiments helped to evaluate the strategy used in construction of the rainbow trout microarray. Researchers developing microarrays for new species are commonly choosing between specially selected genes and clones from normalized and subtracted cDNA libraries. We used SSH, which is at present probably the most popular method of subtraction. Though proven efficient in many studies, this method has a number of drawbacks. Subtraction requires re-association of tester and formation of double-stranded DNA, hence many rare transcripts are not cloned and variations in concentrations of cDNA and hybridization conditions may have strong impacts on library composition. High redundancy is a common feature of the SSH libraries. Apart from these problems, rapid alterations of gene expression observed in this study and many other microarray experiments make the advantages of subtractive cloning ambiguous. Subtraction achieves enrichment of the transcripts, which are over or under represented in the test sample. In many cases one sample will not provide coverage of differentially expressed genes for the whole series, whereas pooling of samples may reduce fluctuations. Furthermore, we observed relatively high ratio of differentially expressed genes among the clones from the unsubtracted cDNA libraries, which are easier for construction and much less redundant. The advantage of subtractive cloning becomes negligible when microarrays are used for different, though related research tasks (Fig. 1B).
At present selection of genes for microarrays is facilitated with advances of functional annotation. This helped us to improve presentation of many functional categories (Table 1) and enhanced interpretation of results. Most of the selected genes did not show differential expression in our studies, however 63% of stress-responsive genes were from this group. In our view, this finding is a strong argument for utilizing Gene Ontology in the development of specialized platforms.
Given the limited number of spots on slides, microarray design requires a careful balance between the number of genes and replication of spots. Apparent advantages of genome-wide platforms are compromised with the problems associated with identifying significantly differentially expressed genes. We preferred combination of multiple spotting and dye-swap normalization, which ensured robust normalization and accurate detection of differential expression at low ratios. Coordinated expression of functionally related genes suggested biological relevance of relatively small alterations in the transcription levels. Selection of differentially expressed genes by the cutoff values would result in loss of valuable information in our experiments. For instance, most of the stress-responsive genes showed small or moderate expression changes, the identification of this group would not be likely without multiple replications.
1. Combination of EST and selected genes appears a reasonable way for construction of cDNA microarrays. Multiple replications of spots and dye swap design of hybridization ensure robust normalization and high power of statistical analyses. Finding of differential expression at small ratios is essential for the functional interpretation of microarray data.
2. Stress response in fish brain and kidney is different both by the target functions and time-course. In brain slow progression of adaptive response was preceded with dramatic transient induction of motor and metal ion binding proteins. Prolonged stress was likely to result in slow degradation of extracellular matrix in kidney.
3. Finding of stress-responsive genes provides possibility for measurement of stress in various conditions and search for the functionally related genes.
1. Computer-assisted analysis of Medline abstracts
Search of Medline was made with queries: "fishes AND stress" (1060 abstracts) and "fishes NOT stress" (10069 abstracts). Abstracts were split into separate words and a list of non-redundant terms was composed. The numbers of abstracts including each term were estimated. The terms were ranked by the Z-scores of hypergeometric distribution and enrichment was analysed with exact Fisher's test (p < 0.05).
2. Experiments with fish, exposure and sampling
One year old rainbow trout were stressed with netting for 2 min, this treatment was repeated once a day for a duration of 5 days. Fish were killed with over-dose of anaesthetic (MS-222) and blood was taken from the caudal vein. The kidneys and brains were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Plasma cortisol was determined with RIA using Orion Spectra Cortisol kit.
3. Preparation of microarrays
RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and mRNA was purified with Dynabeads kit (Dynal). SSH cloning was performed as described . For preparation of normalized libraries, synthesis of cDNA with PowerScript reverse transcriptase (Clontech) was primed with oligonucleotides including EcoRI and NotI sites: 5'-ACGAGGCGAATTC ACAGAGAGGAG(T)VN-3', 5'-GAGAGAGAGTGGTGCGGCCGC GGTGTATGGGG-3'). Double-stranded cDNA was generated using Advantage DNA polymerase mix (Clontech) and PCR primers: 5'-ACGAGGCGAATTC ACAGAGAGGAG-3' and 5'-GAGAGTGGTGCGGCCGC GGTGTA-3'. The PCR products were purified with QIAquick kit (Qiagen), precipitated with ethanol and dissolved to 1 μg/μl in hybridization buffer (1 M NaCl, 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.3), 1 mM EDTA). DNA was denaturated for 5 min at 94°C. Following re-association at 72°C for 16 hours, DNA was ethanol precipitated and digested with 150 U of exonuclease III (MBI Fermentas) for 15 min at 37°C. This treatment eliminates re-associated double-stranded DNA . Single-stranded DNA was PCR amplified, size separated with agarose gel electrophoresis and cloned into pGEM®-11Zf (+) (Promega). Normalized and subtracted cDNA libraries were prepared from the stressed fish (whole fry, brain, kidney and spleen of 1-year old fish). A number of clones were from the rainbow trout and Baltic salmon cDNA libraries constructed in University of Turku. The sequences were analysed with stand-alone blastn and blastx  Microarray incldued 315 genes selected by the Gene Ontology functional categories. Of these, 282 clones were from the normalized multi-tissue library  and the rest were produced with RT PCR. The cDNA inserts were amplified with PCR using universal primers and purified with Millipore Montage PCR96 Cleanup Kit. DNA was spotted onto poly-(L) lysine-coated slides and each clone was printed in 6 replicates.
4. Microarray analyses
Total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and 4 individuals were pooled in each sample. Stressed fish was compared with time-matched control. Labeling with Cy3- and Cy5-dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia) was made using SuperScript III (Invitrogen) and oligo(dT) primer; cDNA was purified with Microcon YM30 (Millipore). We used a dye swap experimental design [14, 15] and each sample was hybridized to two microarrays. For the first slide, test and control cDNA were labeled with Cy5 and Cy3 respectively, and for the second array dye assignments were reversed. The slides were pretreated with 1% BSA, fraction V, 5 x SSC, 0.1% SDS (30 min at 50°C) and washed with 2 x SSC (3 min) and 0.2 x SSC (3 min) and hybridized overnight in cocktail containing 1.3 x Denhardt's, 3 x SSC 0.3% SDS, 0.67 μg/μl polyadenylate and 1.4 μg/μl yeast tRNA. All chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich. Scanning was performed with ScanArray 5000 and images were processed with QuantArray (GSI Luminomics). The measurements in spots were filtered by criteria I/B ≥ 3 and (I-B)/(S I +S B ) ≥ 0.6, where I and B are the mean signal and background intensities and S I , S B are the standard deviations. After subtraction of mean background, lowess normalization  was performed. Differential expression was analysed with Student's t-test (p < 0.01) and the genes were ranked by the log(p-level).
5. Quantitative RT PCR
Primers used for qPCR.
GRB2-related adaptor protein 2
Collagenase type IV
40S ribosomal protein S12
AK designed microarray, carried out experiments with fish and data analyses and drafted the manuscript. HK conducted the microarray analyses. PP developed software for annotation of genes and analyses of Medline abstracts. CR constructed the multi-tissue cDNA library and provided the selected genes. SA developed software for management of microarray data and performed the statistical analyses. HM coordinated research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was supported by the National Agency of Technology, Finland. We wish to thank Rolf Sara (CBT, University of Turku) for preparation of cDNA microarrays and Seppo Kukkonen for analyses of plasma cortisol.
- Gracey AY, Troll JV, Somero GN: Hypoxia-induced gene expression profiling in the euryoxic fish Gillichthys mirabilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 1993-1998. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1993.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rise ML, von Schalburg KR, Brown GD, Mawer MA, Devlin RH, Kuipers N, Busby M, Beetz-Sargent M, Alberto R, Gibbs AR, Hunt P, Shukin R, Zeznik JA, Nelson C, Jones SR, Smailus DE, Jones SJ, Schein JE, Marra MA, Butterfield YS, Stott JM, Ng SH, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Development and application of a salmonid EST database and cDNA microarray: data mining and interspecific hybridization characteristics. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 478-490. 10.1101/gr.1687304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams TD, Gensberg K, Minchin SD, Chipman JK: A DNA expression array to detect toxic stress response in European flounder (Platichthys flesus). Aquat Toxicol. 2003, 65: 141-157. 10.1016/S0166-445X(03)00119-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ju Z, Dunham RA, Liu Z: Differential gene expression in the brain of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in response to cold acclimation. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002, 268: 87-95. 10.1007/s00438-002-0727-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oleksiak MF, Churchill GA, Crawford DL: Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nat Genet. 2002, 32: 261-266. 10.1038/ng983.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ton C, Stamatiou D, Dzau VJ, Liew CC: Construction of a zebrafish cDNA microarray: gene expression profiling of the zebrafish during development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 296: 1134-1142. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02010-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 25-29. 10.1038/75556.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doniger SW, Salomonis N, Dahlquist KD, Vranizan K, Lawlor SC, Conklin BR: MAPPFinder: using Gene Ontology and GenMAPP to create a global gene-expression profile from microarray data. Genome Biol. 2003, 4: R7-10.1186/gb-2003-4-1-r7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Draghici S, Khatri P, Martins RP, Ostermeier GC, Krawetz SA: Global functional profiling of gene expression. Genomics. 2003, 81: 98-104. 10.1016/S0888-7543(02)00021-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herrero J, Al-Shahrour F, Diaz-Uriarte R, Mateos A, Vaquerizas JM, Santoyo J, Dopazo J: GEPAS: A web-based resource for microarray gene expression data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3461-3467. 10.1093/nar/gkg591.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G, Wang MD, Fojo AT, Sunshine M, Narasimhan S, Kane DW, Reinhold WC, Lababidi S, Bussey KJ, Riss J, Barrett JC, Weinstein JN: GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol. 2003, 4: R28-10.1186/gb-2003-4-4-r28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson PN, Wollstein A, Bohme U, Beattie B: Ontologizing gene-expression microarray data: characterizing clusters with Gene Ontology. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 979-981. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth040.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCarroll SA, Murphy CT, Zou S, Pletcher SD, Chin CS, Jan YN, Kenyon C, Bargmann CI, Li H: Comparing genomic expression patterns across species identifies shared transcriptional profile in aging. Nat Genet. 2004, 36: 197-204. 10.1038/ng1291.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerr MK, Churchill GA: Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data. Genet Res. 2001, 77: 123-128. 10.1017/S0016672301005055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Speed T: Normalization for cDNA Microarray Data. In Microarray Optical Technologies and Informatics. Edited by: Bittner ML, Chen Y, Dorsel AN, Dougherty ER. 2001, San Jose: SPIE, Society for Optical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- Wendelaar Bonga SE: The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev. 1997, 77: 591-625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diatchenko L, Chenchik A, Siebert P: Suppression subtractive hybridization: A method for generating subtracted cDNA libraries starting from poly (A+) or total RNA. In RT-PCR Methods for Gene Cloning and Analysis. Edited by: Siebert P, Larrick J. 1998, BioTechniques Books, 213-239.Google Scholar
- Chenchik A, Zhu Y, Diatchenko L, Li R, Hill J, Siebert P: Generation and use of high quality cDNA from small amounts of total RNA by SMART PCR. In RT-PCR Methods for Gene Cloning and Analysis. Edited by: Siebert P, Larrick J. 1998, BioTechniques Books, 305-319.Google Scholar
- Zeng J, Gorski RA, Hamer D: Differential cDNA cloning by enzymatic degrading subtraction (EDS). Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4381-4385.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rexroad CE, Keele JW, Gahr SA, Palti Y, Lee Y, Karamycheva S, Quackenbush J: Sequence analysis of a rainbow trout cDNA library and creation of a Gene Index. Cytogenetics and Genome Research. 2003, 102: 347-354. 10.1159/000075773.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barton BA, Iwama GK: Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids. Annual Review of Fish Diseases. 1991, 1: 3-26. 10.1016/0959-8030(91)90019-G.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nichols NR: Ndrg2, a novel gene regulated by adrenal steroids and antidepressants, is highly expressed in astrocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003, 1007: 349-356. 10.1196/annals.1286.034.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boulkroun S, Fay M, Zennaro MC, Escoubet B, Jaisser F, Blot-Chabaud M, Farman N, Courtois-Coutry N: Characterization of rat NDRG2 (N-Myc downstream regulated gene 2), a novel early mineralocorticoid-specific induced gene. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 31506-31515. 10.1074/jbc.M200272200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halestrap AP, Brennerb C: The adenine nucleotide translocase: a central component of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and key player in cell death. Curr Med Chem. 2003, 10: 1507-1525.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amiry-Moghaddam M, Ottersen OP: The molecular basis of water transport in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003, 4: 991-1001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- West AE, Chen WG, Dalva MB, Dolmetsch RE, Kornhauser JM, Shaywitz AJ, Takasu MA, Tao X, Greenberg ME: Calcium regulation of neuronal gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 11024-11031. 10.1073/pnas.191352298.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown J, Bridgman PC: Role of myosin II in axon outgrowth. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003, 51: 421-428.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bridgman PC: Myosin-dependent transport in neurons. J Neurobiol. 2004, 58: 164-174. 10.1002/neu.10320.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown ME, Bridgman PC: Myosin function in nervous and sensory systems. J Neurobiol. 2004, 58: 118-130. 10.1002/neu.10285.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krasnov A, Teerijoki H, Gorodilov Y, Mölsa H: Cloning of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) alpha-actin, myosin regulatory light chain genes and the 5'-flanking region of alpha-tropomyosin. Functional assessment of promoters. J Exp Biol. 2003, 206: 601-608. 10.1242/jeb.00116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee KH, Ahn JI, Yu DH, Koh HC, Kim SH, Yang BH, Lee YS, Lee YS: Dextromethorphan alters gene expression in rat brain hippocampus and cortex. Int J Mol Med. 2003, 11: 559-568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cleveland WS, Grosse E, Shyu WM: Local regression models. In Statistical Models in S. Edited by: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ. 1992, Pacific Grove: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 309-376.Google Scholar
- Koskinen H, Pehkonen P, Vehniäinen E, Krasnov A, Rexroad C, Afanasyev S, Mölsa H, Oikari A: Response of rainbow trout transcriptome to model chemical contaminants. Biochem Biophys Res Communs. 2004, 320: 745-753. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.