Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparative analysis of Spodoptera frugiperda SF-21-derived ESTs with Sf9- and midgut-derived ESTs1.

From: Analysis and functional annotation of expressed sequence tags from the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda

 

S. frugiperda Sf9ESTs

S. frugiperda midgutESTs

 

Contig

Singlets

Total

Contig

Singlets

Total

Homology

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

E ≤ 0

243

99.59

176

18.51

419

35.06

7

2.87

81

8.52

88

7.36

0 < E ≤ 10-150

0

0.00

37

3.89

37

3.10

2

0.82

17

1.79

19

1.59

10-150 < E ≤ 10-100

0

0.00

47

4.94

47

3.93

4

1.64

16

1.68

20

1.67

10-100 < E ≤ 10-50

0

0.00

58

6.10

58

4.85

0

0.00

24

2.52

24

2.01

10-50 < E ≤ 10-20

0

0.00

49

5.15

49

4.10

1

0.41

30

3.15

31

2.59

10-20 < E ≤ 10-5

0

0.00

50

5.26

50

4.18

4

1.64

72

7.57

76

6.36

Total matched

243

99.59

417

43.85

660

55.23

18

7.38

240

25.24

258

21.59

No match

1

0.41

534

56.15

535

44.77

226

92.62

711

74.76

937

78.41

Total

244

100

951

100

1195

100

244

100

951

100

1195

100

  1. 1 SF-21 ESTs, this report; Sf9 ESTs [12]; midgut ESTs (NCBI dbEST)