Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the six algorithms, using the microarray hybridization data from the MG1655 sequenced strain. The result of using each algorithm were compared to BLASTN data and are shown below.

From: A process for analysis of microarray comparative genomics hybridisation studies for bacterial genomes

 

Cut-off

TP

FP

TN

FN

Sensitivity

Specificity

M-Score

 

0.50

4231

3

1452

58

98.65

99.78

98.90

 

0.33

4244

6

1449

45

98.95

99.59

99.11

Naïve

0.25

4249

10

1445

40

99.07

99.31

99.12

Cut-off

0.20

4253

20

1435

36

99.16

98.63

99.02

 

0.10

4265

125

1330

24

99.44

91.40

97.41

GENCOM*

 

4203

3

1452

86

97.99

99.79

98.45

GACK**

EPP = 50

4116

1

1554

173

95.97

99.93

96.97

 

EPP= 0

4202

3

1452

87

97.97

99.79

98.43

Porwollik

 

4219

2

1453

70

98.37

99.86

98.75

MKD***

 

4243

12

1443

46

98.93

99.18

98.99

Mixture

Bimodal

4256

20

1435

33

99.23

98.63

99.07

 

Trimodal

4236

4

1451

53

98.76

99.73

99.01

  1. The number of genes estimated as correctly conserved (True positives, TP), genes identified as conserved but actually are variable (false positives, FP), genes identified as correctly variable (true negatives TN), and genes identified falsely as variable (false negative FN), are given. The sensitivity, specificity, and M-Score are also calculated, where the sensitivity = TP/(TP+FP), specificity = TN/(FP+TN), and M-Score = Sensitivity*prevalence + Specificity*(1-prevalence)
  2. * Institute of Food Research method (GENCOM)
  3. ** Genotyping Analysis by Charlie Kim method (GACK)
  4. *** Minimum Kernel Density method (MKD)