Table 4 Summary of the performance of each algorithm using CGH microarray data for the MG1655 sequenced strain. The sensitivity, specificity, and M-score generated from each of the cut-off algorithms from the CGH data were summarized for comparison.
Algorithm | M-Score | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
Naive Cut-off (0.25) | 99.12 | 99.07 | 99.31 |
Mixture Model (Bimodal) | 99.07 | 99.23 | 98.63 |
MKD | 98.99 | 98.93 | 99.18 |
Porwollik | 98.75 | 98.37 | 99.86 |
GENCOM | 98.45 | 97.99 | 99.79 |
GACK EPP = 0 | 98.43 | 97.97 | 99.79 |