- Research article
- Open Access
Identification of radiation-induced aberrant hypomethylation in colon cancer
© Bae et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015
- Received: 6 September 2014
- Accepted: 9 January 2015
- Published: 6 February 2015
Exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) results in the simultaneous activation or downregulation of multiple signaling pathways that play critical roles in cell type-specific control of survival or death. IR is a well-known genotoxic agent and human carcinogen that induces cellular damage through direct and indirect mechanisms. However, its impact on epigenetic mechanisms has not been elucidated, and more specifically, little information is available regarding genome-wide DNA methylation changes in cancer cells after IR exposure. Recently, genome-wide DNA methylation profiling technology using the Illumina HumanMethylation450K platform has emerged that allows us to query >450,000 loci within the genome. This improved technology is capable of identifying genome-wide DNA methylation changes in CpG islands and other CpG island-associated regions.
In this study, we employed this technology to test the hypothesis that exposure to IR not only induces differential DNA methylation patterns at a genome-wide level, but also results in locus- and gene-specific DNA methylation changes. We screened for differential DNA methylation changes in colorectal cancer cells after IR exposure with 2 and 5 Gy. Twenty-nine genes showed radiation-induced hypomethylation in colon cancer cells, and of those, seven genes showed a corresponding increase in gene expression by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In addition, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to confirm that the DNA-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) level associated with the promoter regions of these genes correlated with their methylation level and gene expression changes. Finally, we used a gene ontology (GO) database to show that a handful of hypomethylated genes induced by IR are associated with a variety of biological pathways related to cancer.
We identified alterations in global DNA methylation patterns and hypomethylation at specific cancer-related genes following IR exposure, which suggests that radiation exposure plays a critical role in conferring epigenetic alterations in cancer.
- Ionizing radiation
- DNA hypomethylation
- Methylation profiling
- Gene ontology
- Colon cancer
Epigenetics is defined as heritable changes in gene expression that are not accompanied by changes in DNA sequences . Epigenetic mechanisms are essential for the maintenance of tissue-specific gene expression patterns, and they are required for normal mammalian development. Disregulation of epigenetic processes can lead to altered gene function and malignant cellular transformation, and global changes in the epigenetic landscape are a hallmark of cancer.
Epigenetics is becoming more widely investigated in the field of cancer biology. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is mediated primarily through DNA methylation, microRNAs (miRNAs), and histone modifications, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. DNA methylation is perhaps the most extensively studied epigenetic modification in mammals. Generally, there are two types of alterations that can occur in the DNA methylation patterns in cancer at both locus-specific and genome-wide levels: hypomethylation and hypermethylation . In the field of cancer epigenetics, most research has focused on the role and clinical relevance of the hypermethylation of tumor suppressor gene promoters . However, there have been far fewer studies on the role of DNA hypomethylation, even though global DNA hypomethylation is a well-known characteristic of cancer cells. This hypomethylation is specifically enriched in mobile genetic elements, such as long interspersed element 1 (LINE1) and Alu elements. .
Unlike genetic alterations, epigenetic alterations are often reversible, which makes elucidating the mechanisms of epigenetic regulation extremely attractive from the perspective of developing new therapeutic approaches. The reversible nature of epigenetic aberrations has led to the emergence of the promising field of epigenetic therapy.
Ionizing radiation (IR) is a potentially lethal threat to all organisms, but it is also an efficient and valuable treatment option in cancer therapy . Radiation therapy triggers a complex, multi-pathway cellular response that usually results in the death of cancer cells. Although IR is a well-known genotoxic agent and human carcinogen that induces cellular damage through direct and indirect mechanisms , its impact on epigenetic mechanisms has not been elucidated.
Our previous study suggested that the combination of IR and the demethylating agent 5-aza--2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) could be an effective treatment strategy for colon cancer . These data also prompted us to explore the potential molecular alterations responsible for the biological effects observed after treatment with IR and 5-aza-dC. In rodents, IR can affect global DNA methylation and cause significant and persistent DNA hypomethylation in radiation target genes, and in human cells, IR can cause genome instability . However, there has been a lack of studies on the effects of IR on locus- and gene-specific DNA methylation. Several groups have performed gene expression profiling to understand how IR affects radiosensitive cancer cells at the molecular level [9,10]. Other studies have shown that treatment with 5-aza-dC to reduce global DNA methylation has a radiosensitizing effect, suggesting that DNA methylation plays a role in radiation resistance [11,12]. However, little information is available regarding DNA methylation changes at the genome-wide level in cancer cells after IR exposure.
Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling technology using the Illumina HumanMethylation450K array allows us to query >450,000 loci within the genome and to cover 99% of RefSeq genes . This improved technology can provide a more powerful and comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation changes. In this study, we employed this technology to test the hypothesis that exposure to IR not only induces differential DNA methylation patterns at a genome-wide level, but also affects methylation at a locus- and gene-specific level. We screened for differential DNA methylation changes in colorectal cancer cells after IR exposure with 2 and 5 Gy. We identified global DNA methylation changes and gene-specific hypomethylation at bona fide target genes that were induced by IR exposure.
IR induces global DNA methylation changes in colon cancer cells
We previously demonstrated that pretreatment with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-dC sensitizes colon cancer cells to IR. More specifically, we showed that the level of apoptosis is greater when the cells are treated with a combination of 5-aza-dC and IR than when they are treated with either agent alone, suggesting that the combination of 5-aza-dC and IR is a potential strategy for the treatment of cancer . These data led us to explore whether IR exposure induces DNA methylation changes at both the genome-wide level and the locus- or gene-specific levels in colon cancer.
To determine the DNA methylation changes that occur after IR exposure in colon cancer, we chose HCT116 colorectal cancer cells as a model, because we had shown in a previous study that 5-aza-dC treatment enhances the sensitivity of HCT116 cells to IR. In this study, HCT116 cells were exposed to 2 different IR doses, 2 or 5 Gy, which are known to not induce a high rate of apoptosis with a single treatment. We also treated HCT116 cells with 5-aza-dC (0.5 μM), which served as an internal control for estimating the global demethylation levels.
To determine genome-wide DNA methylation changes, we performed DNA methylation profiling. HCT116 cells were irradiated at 2 or 5 Gy, or treated with 5-aza-dC for 72 hrs. Next, the isolated DNA was subjected to genome-wide level DNA methylation profiling using the Illumina HumanMethylation450K BeadChip. The irradiated and 5-aza-dC-treated samples were compared to mock-treated samples to determine regions of differential DNA methylation.
Identification of radiation-induced hypomethylation in colon cancer cells
Next, we focused on the identification of radiation-induced hypomethylated genes or loci in HCT116 cells. We applied a strict filter to identify the hypomethylated candidate genes induced by radiation at 2 or 5 Gy, or by 5-aza-dC treatment (Δβ-values <1.5 fold compared with mock-treated cells) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). After we excluded non-reliable probes based on Δβ-values in control (mock treated) dataset, we normalized the DNA methylation data by comparing the mock-treated cells with the 5-aza-dC- or IR-treated cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1). In particular, 5-aza-dC, a strong inducer of DNA de-methylation (global hypomethylation), is, an analogue of cytosine, that when incorporated into DNA, irreversibly binds the methyltransferase enzymes as they attempt to methylate the cytosine analogue. This depletion of methyltransferase in the cell results in passive de-methylation, which is known to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes . Therefore, the dataset from the 5-aza-dC-treated cells was a necessary control to help identify the candidate genes that were hypomethylated by radiation. With our criteria (Δβ-values < I1.5I fold), we detected 4,675, 89, and 71 probes in 5-aza-dC-treated cells, 2 Gy-irradiated cells, and 5 Gy-irradiated cells, respectively (Figure 2A). Comparing with irradiated cells and 5-aza-dC, indeed, 25 probes were identified from the 2 Gy-irradiated dataset, and 21 probes were identified from the 5 Gy-irradiated dataset, and probes related 29 candiate genes were identified by comparing with the 5-aza-dC-treated dataset (Figure 2A and Additional file 1: Figure S1). Using heatmap analysis of these probes, we observed the differences in the DNA methylation levels between control cells and 5-aza-dC- or IR-treated cells (Figure 2B, C). We believe that these final candidate genes are truly hypomethylated by radiation.
Radiation-induced hypomethylated genes show a corresponding increase in gene expression in colon cancer cells
Information of target genes
NM_001146.3; NM_001199859.1; NM_139290.1
NM_001166050.1; NM_001166051.1; NM_001166052.1; NM_001166053.1; NM_001166054.1; NM_004307.1; NM_173075.4
Amyloid Beta (A4) Precursor Protein-Binding, Family B, Member 2
NM_001001935.2; NM_001001937.1; NM_001257334.1; NM_001257335.1; NM_004046.5
ATP Synthase, H+ Transporting, Mitochondrial F1 Complex, Alpha Subunit 1, Cardiac Muscle
SKI/DACH Domain Containing 1
NM_145246.4; NM_203438.2; NM_203439.2; NM_203440.2; NM_203441.2
Fragile Site, Folic Acid Type, Rare, Fra(10)(Q23.3) Or Fra(10)(Q24.2) Candidate 1
NM_001082972.1; NM_001082973.1; NM_001204101.1; NM_001204102.1; NM_018272.3
Cancer Susceptibility Candidate 1
Chromogranin A (Parathyroid Secretory Protein 1)
Connective Tissue Growth Factor
Coxsackie Virus And Adenovirus Receptor Pseudogene 2
HAUS Augmin-Like Complex, Subunit 1
Interferon, Gamma-Inducible Protein 16
IgLON Family Member 5
Lamin B Receptor
Lectin, Mannose-Binding, 1
LYR Motif Containing 5
Myotubularin Related Protein 8
PDZ Domain Containing Ring Finger 3
Phospholipase C-Like 2
Pleckstrin Homology Domain Containing, Family M (With RUN Domain) Member 2
NM_001193520.1; NM_001193521.1; NM_004658.2
RAS Protein Activator Like 1 (GAP1 Like)
NM_001284498.1; NM_001284499.1; NM_152346.2
Solute Carrier Family 43, Member 2
NM_001251825.1; NM_003109.1; NM_138473.2
Sp1 Transcription Factor
Transcription Elongation Regulator 1-Like
Testis Specific Protein, Y-Linked 1
Testis Specific Protein, Y-Linked 4
Zinc Finger Protein 175
Zinc Finger Protein 69
Zinc Finger, SWIM-Type Containing 5
To verify the methylation status of these genes, we used methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis. We tested three (APBB2, CHGA, and CTGF) genes out of the seven genes as a representative example. As shown in Figure 3B, we confirmed the methylation status of the CpG islands around the APBB2 , CHGA, and CTGF by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP). These data confirmed that the these genes are strong candidate hypomethylated genes by IR.
Radiation-induced hypomethylated genes show decreased levels of DNMT1 in their promoter regions
Although we identified a handful of genes that were hypomethylated following irradiation, we wanted to determine whether these genes are associated with a particular cellular pathway or network. We analyzed our candidate gene list using well-curated databases (GO, GeneMANIA and KEGG) that include a variety of biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components (Additional file 1: Figure S3). The possible roles of the candidate genes can be hypothesized by looking at the various signaling pathways predicted by KEGG pathway analysis (Additional file 2: Table S2). Collectively, these data suggested that the radiation-induced hypomethylated genes play important roles not only in response to radiation, but also in cellular regulatory events.
DNA methylation plays a crucial role in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin organization within normal eukaryotic cells. In cancer, global patterns of DNA methylation are altered. Tumor cells often show global hypomethylation of repeat elements and hypermethylation of promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes or a subset of CpG-dense gene-associated regions (CpG islands).
We previously showed that 5-aza-dC pretreatment increases the radiosensitivity of colon cancer cells, and that the combination of 5-aza-dC treatment and IR promotes apoptosis, suggesting that this combination treatment could be useful for clinical applications . Based on this previous work, we proposed to examine the DNA methylation level of each gene or loci in the genome that could potentially be involved in radiosensitivity. This information is also important for determining the proper use of demethylation agents as radiotherapy sensitizers or chemotherapeutics. Therefore, here, we performed genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of colon cancer cells after treatment with 5-aza-dC or IR to examine the DNA methylation alterations, and we showed that IR treatment of cancer cells resulted in extensive changes in the DNA methylation status of genes.
Other possible mechanism for radiation-induced global demethylation is the relocalization of DNMTs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm , which may cause a change in the DNA methylation maintenance machinery in the genome. In addition, it is possible that radiation promotes the enzymatic replacement of 5-methylcytosine with cytosine .
Although the mechanisms underlying this radiosensitization effect are not well understood, several studies have shown that radiation induces global hypomethylation in human cancers, as evidenced by the depleted expression levels of DNMT1, MBP proteins, and MeCP2 [22-24]. Here, we have focused on identification of radiation induced hypomethylated genes in colon cancer cells. Using genome-wide DNA methylation array, we have demonstrated the radiation effect on global genome or specific gene as a model system to provide evidence for radiation induced hypomethylation.
Previously, several tumor- and proliferation-associated genes were found to be hypomethylated in human cancers. For example, the pS2 gene, which encodes a pleotropic factor implicated in the control of cell proliferation, shows cancer-associated hypomethylation and the concordant changes in gene expression . In addition, radiation induces hypomethylation and expression of urinary-type plasminogen activator (uPA) in meningioma, which could contribute to meningioma progression in vitro and in vivo . However, there is still little information on radiation-induced hypomethylation of specific genes in cancer. In the present study, we showed radiation-induced hypomethylation in colon cancer cells, and we identified several hypomethylated genes that also showed upregulated gene expression and downregulated DNMT1 levels in their promoter regions.
It has been known that radiation has been shown to induce global hypomethylation . In terms of losing DNA methylation level at globally, decreased genomic DNA methylation was observed at 24–72 hrs post-irradiation in cell lines and this could be due to decreased levels of DNA methyltrasferases (DNMTs). Although several previous reports have done to see the genomic hypomethylation with irradiation after different time points and showed global hypomethylation with different profiles without specific loci or genes , we limited one time point (72 hrs after 2Gy and 5Gy irradiation) and interestingly we have indeed reached to identification of purely IR induced hypomethylated genes along with global hypomethylation at the genome level.
To date, DNA methylation profiling to determine responses to ionizing radiation has not been well described. Kim et al. performed DNA methylation profiling to compare a radioresistant lung cancer cell line to a radiosensitive lung cancer cell line using Illumina BeadChip to query 27,578 CpG sites . They found 1,091 genes that were differentially methylated. However, they did not show that the differentially methylated genes were functionally associated with the radiosensitive phenotype. More recently, Antwih et al. identified DNA methylation changes induced by IR using the HumanMethylation450K array platform in breast cancer cell line . They suggested that that the differentially methylated genes were associated with cellular processes, such as cell cycle, DNA repair, and apoptosis pathways. Although similar approach applied to this study with our work, this study differs from our work in terms of identification of radiation induced hypomethylated genes. In our strick criteria, we did not see any genes are hypermetylated by IR, therefore we could focused on radiation induced hypoemthyaltion and the fact is that actual our candidate genes are hypomethylated (demethylated) in not only in irradiated cells but also 5-aza-dC treated cells as well as downregulated their gene expression by RT-PCR in both, which Specfically, while this work demonstrated that rdadiation may induce DNA methylation changes and identify the loci-specific changeds in DNA methylation as we do here, the expereimetnal for validation for target genes was not designed to show if these gene expression are regulated by DNA methylation by IR. In our study, genome-wide DNA methylation array was useful to identify new genes are induced hypemethylation of them by IR and we can stress here that these genes were newly identified genes are hypomethylated by IR with specific validation by several experimental tools such as qRT-PCR to confirm the correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression and to see if these genes are actually targeted by DNMT at the transcriptional level by ChIP assaye transcriptional level. Since this study did not use 5-aza-dC treated cells.
IR exposure results in the simultaneous activation or downregulation of multiple signaling pathways that play critical roles in cell type-specific control of survival or death. Although IR is a well-known genotoxic agent and human carcinogen , very recent studies have suggested that epigenetic mechanisms that are associated with gene silencing, such as histone modifications and DNA methylation, may be involved in regulating radiosensitivity in cancer cells. A number of previous studies have reported that several histone deacetylase inhibitors are cytotoxic and can sensitize tumor cells to radiotherapy. However, little information is available regarding the effects of DNMT inhibitors on radiosensitization [12,28]. Our previous work demonstrated that global DNA methylation changes, especially demethylation by 5-aza-dC, could be important for radiosensitization. We showed that the combination of 5-aza-dC and IR treatment results in the apoptosis of colon cancer cells, suggesting that this combination could be a novel cancer treatment. In this study, we further demonstrated that radiation induces hypomethylation of site-specific genes in colon cancer cells.
We searched the literature to identify the biological functions of our bona fide radiation-induced hypomethylated genes. The amyloid beta A4 precursor protein-binding, family B, member 2 (APBB2) gene encodes a protein that binds to amyloid beta precursor protein (APP), which is central to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease . In addition, overexpression of APBB2 in PC12 cells inhibits cell cycle progression through its nuclear translocation and inhibition of thymidilate synthase, which ultimately leads to a cell cycle delay . Its role in cell cycle regulation could also be related to the role of APBB2 in neurodegeneration. Chromogranin A (CHGA) regulates catecholamine storage and release through intracellular and extracellular mechanisms . CHGA is also a candidate gene that contributes to autonomic dysfunction syndromes, including the intermediate phenotypes that contribute to hypertension . Chga-null mice show abnormal changes in the autonomic control of circulation, further suggesting a role for CHGA in hypertension risk . Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is also known as insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 8 (IGFBP8). There is little information regarding the biological function of the CTGF gene in cancer. However, a polymorphism in the promoter of the CTGF gene, accompanied by its transcriptional repression, is associated with susceptibility to systemic sclerosis . In addition, Nakanish et al. showed that the CTGF gene may be involved in bone and testis development using transgenic Ctgf-overexpressing mice . L-type amino acid transporter 4 (LAT4, also known as SLC43A2) mediates the sodium-independent transport of bulky neutral amino acids across cell membranes . Taken together, we have identified genes of unknown function in radiosensitivity that are hypomethylated in response to radiation and show corresponding alterations in DNMT1 association and gene expression in colon cancer cells.
In summary, we have analyzed the genome--wide CpG methylation profiles of HCT116 cells to identify IR induced DNA methylation changes. We found that IR induces DNA hypomethylation, rather than hypermethylation, at the genome-wide level by comparing with the DNA methylation profiles of 5-aza-dC treated cells. Among these DNA methylation changes, we found bona fide site-specific genes that were hypomethylated by IR. Furthermore, these genes showed increased gene expression and decreased levels of DNMT1 in their promoter regions that correlated with their degree of hypomethylation. Therefore, these data strongly suggest that radiation exposure plays a critical role in regulating epigenetic alterations in human cancer.
Cell culture and 5-Aza-dC treatment
The human colorectal carcinoma cell line HCT116 was obtained from ATCC and cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium (WelGENE) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C in a humid incubator with 5% CO2. The cells were treated with 0.5 μM 5-aza-dC (Sigma) for 3 days, replacing media and 5-aza-dC every 24 hrs.
The cells were exposed to gamma rays through the air-center mode after changing to fresh media. All irradiations were performed using a 137Cs-ray source (Eckert & Ziegler) at a dose rate of 2.6 Gy/min. Following irradiation at doses of 2 and 5 Gy, the cells were incubated for 3 days at 37°C in a humid incubator with 5% CO2.
The Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip (Illumina) includes 485,577 CpG sites located throughout the genome . Genomic DNA from HCT116 cells [mock, irradiated (2 and 5 Gy), and 5-aza-dC (0.5 μM for 72 hrs) treated] was isolated using a phenol/chloroform method. Bisulfite modification of genomic DNA was performed using an EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research). The bisulfite conversion efficiency was determined by sample-dependent controls on the chip and was displayed in the quality control panel in the software. All samples passed quality control measurements. The samples were run on an Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip (Illumina) and scanned on an Illumina iScan instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The methylation values for individual CpG sites in each sample were obtained as β-values. The β-value generated for each CpG locus measure the intensity of methylated (β = 1) and unmethylated probes (β = 0). The β-value is a continuous variable that is calculated by dividing the intensity of the methylated beads by the combined intensity, and these values range from 0 to 1. A CpG locus was considered differentially methylated if the β-value was > = |0.2| and its ratio was > |1.5|X fold compared to control (mock treated). This cut-off value of |0.2| represents the 99% confidence interval of the detection limit .
>I1.5I fold demethylated (hypomethylated) probes were independently analyzed in control (mock treated) vs. 5-aza-dC treated cells, control vs. 2 Gy irradiated cells or control vs. 5 Gy irradiated cells. The selected probes were 4,675, 89 and 71 probes, respectively. Commonly hypoemthylaed probes were collected between control vs. 5-aza-dC treated cells and control vs. 2 Gy irradiated cells, or between and control vs. 5 Gy irradiated cells via Venn diagram analysis, and finally common hypomethylated probes (25 and 21 probes, respectively) were analyzed. Hierarchical clustering was performed with Agilent GeneSpring GX 7.3 software using common hypomethylated probes. Pearson Correlation was used for similarity measurement.
Western blotting was performed as described previously . The antibodies used for western blot analysis were anti-DNMT1 (Sigma), anti-DNMT3a (Sigma), and anti-β-actin (Sigma).
cDNA synthesis and quantitative RT-PCR
The cells were trypsinized and homogenized using a QIAshredder Kit (QIAGEN). Total RNA from the cells was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). The RNA quantity was measured using a NanoDrop 2000/2000c instrument (Thermo Scientific). For cDNA synthesis, 1 μg of total mRNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad). The reaction was performed at 25°C for 5 min and then 42°C for 30 min, and was terminated by heating to 85°C for 5 min.
The target gene transcripts were analyzed by qRT-PCR, which was performed using a CFX96TM Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad). All primers were designed using the Primer3 program (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/) and are listed in the Additional file 2: Table S1. For normalization, human GAPDH was amplified.
Bisulfite modification and quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP)
Genomic DNA was isolated from HCT116 cells using a phenol/chloroform method. Bisulfite modification of 2 μg of genomic DNA was performed using an EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research). For positive and negative controls, in vitro methylated DNA (IVD) and H2O were treated, respectively. For methylation analysis of target genes, qMSP amplification was performed on bisulfite-treated samples and normalized by an Alu element. All primers were designed using MethPrimer (http://www.urogene.org/cgi-bin/methprimer/methprimer.cgi) and are presented in Additional file 2: Table S1. qRT-PCR was performed with a CFX96TM Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
ChIP assays were performed as previously described . PCR was performed using a C1000 Thermal Cycler (BioRad) with the ChIP primers that are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1. An anti-DNMT1 antibody (Sigma) was used to immunoprecipitate the DNMT1-associated chromatin fragments.
Human colorectal carcinoma cell line HCT116 used in this study is publically available through ATCC.
This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (DIRAMS) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (50591-2015). We would like to thank Khadijah Mitchell at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine for critical reading of the manuscript and providing language help.
- Esteller M. Epigenetics in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(11):1148–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ehrlich M. DNA hypomethylation in cancer cells. Epigenomics. 2009;1(2):239–59.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones PA, Baylin SB. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 2007;128(4):683–92.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han K, Lee J, Km H-S, Yang K, Yi JM. DNA methylation of mobile genetic elements in human cancers. Gene Genom. 2013;35(3):265–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poortmans P. Evidence based radiation oncology: breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84(1):84–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodhead DT. Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;65(1):7–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim J-G, Bae J-H, Kim J-A, Heo K, Yang K-M, Yi JM. Combination effect of epigenetic regulation and ionizing radiation in colorectal cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105405.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raiche J, Rodriguez-Juarez R, Pogribny I, Kovalchuk O. Sex- and tissue-specific expression of maintenance and de novo DNA methyltransferases upon low dose X-irradiation in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;325(1):39–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park WY, Hwang CI, Im CN, Kang MJ, Woo JH, Kim JH, et al. Identification of radiation-specific responses from gene expression profile. Oncogene. 2002;21(55):8521–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amundson SA, Do KT, Vinikoor L, Koch-Paiz CA, Bittner ML, Trent JM, et al. Stress-specific signatures: expression profiling of p53 wild-type and -null human cells. Oncogene. 2005;24(28):4572–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HJ, Kim JH, Chie EK, Young PD, Kim IA, Kim IH. DNMT (DNA methyltransferase) inhibitors radiosensitize human cancer cells by suppressing DNA repair activity. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:39.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofstetter B, Niemierko A, Forrer C, Benhattar J, Albertini V, Pruschy M, et al. Impact of genomic methylation on radiation sensitivity of colorectal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(5):1512–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, Ho V, Klotzle B, Le JM, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011;98(4):288–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kovalchuk O, Burke P, Besplug J, Slovack M, Filkowski J, Pogribny I. Methylation changes in muscle and liver tissues of male and female mice exposed to acute and chronic low-dose X-ray-irradiation. Mutat Res. 2004;548(1–2):75–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pogribny I, Raiche J, Slovack M, Kovalchuk O. Dose-dependence, sex- and tissue-specificity, and persistence of radiation-induced genomic DNA methylation changes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;320(4):1253–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michalowsky LA, Jones PA. Differential nuclear protein binding to 5-azacytosine-containing DNA as a potential mechanism for 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine resistance. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7(9):3076–83.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herman JG, Baylin SB. Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(21):2042–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhee I, Jair KW, Yen RW, Lengauer C, Herman JG, Kinzler KW, et al. CpG methylation is maintained in human cancer cells lacking DNMT1. Nature. 2000;404(6781):1003–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhee I, Bachman KE, Park BH, Jair KW, Yen RW, Schuebel KE, et al. DNMT1 and DNMT3b cooperate to silence genes in human cancer cells. Nature. 2002;416(6880):552–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalinich JF, Catravas GN, Snyder SL. The effect of gamma radiation on DNA methylation. Radiat Res. 1989;117(2):185–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Razin A, Cedar H. DNA methylation and genomic imprinting. Cell. 1994;77(4):473–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Velpula KK, Gogineni VR, Nalla AK, Dinh DH, Rao JS. Radiation-induced hypomethylation triggers urokinase plasminogen activator transcription in meningioma cells. Neoplasia. 2013;15(2):192–203.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loree J, Koturbash I, Kutanzi K, Baker M, Pogribny I, Kovalchuk O. Radiation-induced molecular changes in rat mammary tissue: possible implications for radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006;82(11):805–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antwih DA, Gabbara KM, Lancaster WD, Ruden DM, Zielske SP. Radiation-induced epigenetic DNA methylation modification of radiation-response pathways. Epigenetics. 2013;8(8):839–48.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin V, Ribieras S, Song-Wang XG, Lasne Y, Frappart L, Rio MC, et al. Involvement of DNA methylation in the control of the expression of an estrogen-induced breast-cancer-associated protein (pS2) in human breast cancers. J Cell Biochem. 1997;65(1):95–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chaudhry MA, Omaruddin RA. Differential DNA methylation alterations in radiation-sensitive and -resistant cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2012;31(6):908–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim EH, Park AK, Dong SM, Ahn JH, Park WY. Global analysis of CpG methylation reveals epigenetic control of the radiosensitivity in lung cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2010;29(33):4725–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dote H, Cerna D, Burgan WE, Carter DJ, Cerra MA, Hollingshead MG, et al. Enhancement of in vitro and in vivo tumor cell radiosensitivity by the DNA methylation inhibitor zebularine. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(12):4571–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Hollingworth P, Moore P, Foy C, Archer N, Powell J, et al. Genetic association of the APP binding protein 2 gene (APBB2) with late onset Alzheimer disease. Hum Mutat. 2005;25(3):270–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruni P, Minopoli G, Brancaccio T, Napolitano M, Faraonio R, Zambrano N, et al. Fe65, a ligand of the Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid precursor protein, blocks cell cycle progression by down-regulating thymidylate synthase expression. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(38):35481–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen G, Mahata SK, Cadman P, Mahata M, Ghosh S, Mahapatra NR, et al. Both rare and common polymorphisms contribute functional variation at CHGA, a regulator of catecholamine physiology. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(2):197–207.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahapatra NR, O’Connor DT, Vaingankar SM, Hikim AP, Mahata M, Ray S, et al. Hypertension from targeted ablation of chromogranin A can be rescued by the human ortholog. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1942–52.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca C, Lindahl GE, Ponticos M, Sestini P, Renzoni EA, Holmes AM, et al. A polymorphism in the CTGF promoter region associated with systemic sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(12):1210–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakanishi T, Yamaai T, Asano M, Nawachi K, Suzuki M, Sugimoto T, et al. Overexpression of connective tissue growth factor/hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product 24 decreases bone density in adult mice and induces dwarfism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;281(3):678–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bodoy S, Martin L, Zorzano A, Palacin M, Estevez R, Bertran J. Identification of LAT4, a novel amino acid transporter with system L activity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(12):12002–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S, Serra-Musach J, Pujana MA, Bibikova M, et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics. 2011;6(6):692–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JG, Kim TO, Bae JH, Shim JW, Kang MJ, Yang K, et al. Epigenetically regulated MIR941 and MIR1247 target gastric cancer cell growth and migration. Epigenetics. 2014;9(7):1018–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barlev NA, Liu L, Chehab NH, Mansfield K, Harris KG, Halazonetis TD, et al. Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases. Mol Cell. 2001;8(6):1243–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.