Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of SWER, MEC and runtimes for different schemes on simulated biallelic triploid data

From: SDhaP: haplotype assembly for diploids and polyploids via semi-definite programming

Dataset parameters

Genotyping error rate

SDhaP

HapTree

  

MEC

SWER

t(in secs)

MEC

SWER

t(in secs)

length 103, cov 15

0.0348

170

0.0130

18

401

0.0430

1860

length 103, cov 30

0.0135

331

0.0027

90

582

0.0220

8

length 103, cov 45

0.0064

488

0.0013

183

614

0.0053

5

length 104, cov 15

0.0348

1848

0.0143

388

-

-

-

length 104, cov 30

0.0135

4091

0.0038

1289

4744

0.0191

680

length 104, cov 45

0.0064

6169

0.0025

2048

5492

0.0060

2424

  1. MEC, SWER and running times for SDhaP and HapTree algorithms on biallelic triploid simulated data. For l = 104 and c = 15, HapTree did not complete the task in 48 hrs.