Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons between condition-dependent and temporal regulation of gene expression

From: Genome-wide profiling of 24 hr diel rhythmicity in the water flea, Daphnia pulex: network analysis reveals rhythmic gene expression and enhances functional gene annotation

Experiment

Conditions

Genotypes

Overlap d

Thermal regime a

18 °C vs. 28 °C

Low tolerance genotype C

11 % / 183

  

Low tolerance genotype E

12 % / 199

  

High tolerance genotype B

7 % / 116

  

High tolerance genotype K

7 % / 116

Salinity stress b

5 gL−1 NaCl vs. control

High tolerance genotype

38 % / 631

  

Low tolerance genotype

33 % / 548

Carbon:Phosphorous ratio c

HiC:LoP (C:P ~800) vs. LoC:HiP (C:P ~100) (3 days)

G1: LoC:HiP tolerance

4 % / 66

  

G2: HiC:LoP tolerance

8 % / 133

 

HiC:LoP (C:P ~800) vs. LoC:HiP (C:P ~100) (6 h)

G1: LoC:HiP tolerance

16 % / 266

  

G2: HiC:LoP tolerance

9 % / 149

  1. aYampolsky et al. 2014 [75]
  2. bLatta et al. 2012 [76]
  3. cChowdhury et al. 2014 [77]
  4. dThe number and percent of genes both differentially expressed in the given experimental treatment conditions (q < 0.05) and also rhythmically expressed as determined by JTK_CYCLE in this present study (q < 0.05)