Skip to main content

Table 1 Neuropeptide transcript differential expression statistics

From: Transcriptomic analysis of crustacean neuropeptide signaling during the moult cycle in the green shore crab, Carcinus maenas

Neuropeptide

Cluster

LogFC

F

P

FDR

A-B

D1

D3

D4

Carcikinin/ETH

Cluster-5052.1

1.18

2.31

4.4

5.9

47.91

5.42E-11

2.63E-06

CHH-2

Cluster-569.33175

2.76

0.04

1.6

3.21

7.14

0.001

0.023

Neuroparsin-3

Cluster-141,623.0

−1.27

1.68

−0.32

0.14

7.03

0.001

0.024

CFSH

Cluster-126,814.0

3.74

5.66

4.19

0.72

6.4

0.001

0.034

CCAP

Cluster-569.9440

−0.62

−0.93

− 0.32

0.22

6.66

0.002

0.041

Bursicon-α

Cluster-129,891.0

−0.57

−1.17

− 0.16

0.3

5.36

0.003

0.062

Bursicon-β

Cluster-121,462.0

−0.54

−1.1

− 0.07

0.21

5.02

0.005

0.076

Allatostatin-CC

Cluster-154,370.0

−0.35

− 0.9

0.02

0.22

5.52

0.008

0.112

  1. Differential gene expression analysis statistics for five C. maenas neuropeptides which were differentially expressed across the moult cycle (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05, bold font above line) and three non-differentially expressed neuropeptides (P < 0.05 but FDR > 0.05, below line) within the CNS. LogFC are relative to moult stage C3–4. The P-value should be read in conjunction with the false discovery rate (FDR)