From: A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms
 | Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|---|
NanoString | (1) RNAs are directly measured without amplification or cloning; (2) Digital readout generates less background noise; and (3) Allows high dynamic range of expressions. | (1) Only a limited number of probes are available to measure isoform or gene expression; and (2) Sophisticated custom probe design is often needed. |
RNA-seq | (1) No requirement of gene annotations; (2) Capable of detecting novel splicing isoforms; (3) Allows high dynamic range of expressions; and (4) Provides transcriptome-wide expression profiling. | (1) Transcript specific bias/ 3’-end bias; and (2) Various sampling biases as a result of library preparation protocols. |
Exon-array | (1) Provides transcriptome-wide expression profiling; and (2) Capable of measuring expressions at exons and exon-junctions. | (1) Limited dynamic range; (2) Requires a higher amount of molecules in RNA preparation; and (3) Depends on existing genome annotation. |
RT-qPCR | (1) High dynamic range of expressions; (2) Less biased results; and (3) much cheaper in comparison to RNA-seq and Microarray on a small-scale study. | (1) Only a limited number of transcripts can be measured; and (2) Custom primer designs are often needed. |