Skip to main content

Table 3 GO classification of the differentially expressed genes from R. philippinarum under hypoxia stress

From: Transcriptome analysis reveals differential immune related genes expression in Ruditapes philippinarum under hypoxia stress: potential HIF and NF-κB crosstalk in immune responses in clam

Term

Comparison

Type

Gene

p-Value

immune system process (GO:0002376)

H1 vs N1

BP

71

0.000218

antioxidant activity (GO:0016209)

H1 vs N1

MF

20

0.000309

immune response (GO:0006955)

H1 vs N1

BP

60

0.000311

tumor necrosis factor receptor binding (GO:0005164)

H1 vs N1

MF

20

0.000474

peroxidase activity (GO:0004601)

H1 vs N1

MF

7

0.003901

regulation of apoptotic process (GO:0042981)

H1 vs N1

BP

58

0.004872

oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491)

H2 vs N2

MF

278

3.24E-07

antioxidant activity (GO:0016209)

H2 vs N2

MF

23

2.05E-05

peroxiredoxin activity (GO:0051920)

H2 vs N2

MF

7

0.000251

immune system process (GO:0002376)

H3 vs N3

MF

61

0.000900

antioxidant activity (GO:0016209)

H3 vs N3

MF

19

0.000159

immune response (GO:0006955)

H3 vs N3

BP

51

0.001554

tumor necrosis factor receptor binding (GO:0005164)

H3 vs N3

MF

21

2.92E-05

cytokine receptor binding (GO:0005126)

H3 vs N3

MF

34

4.99E-05

defense response (GO:0006952)

H vs N

BP

5

0.000556

response to stress (GO:0006950)

H vs N

BP

7

0.007614

oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491)

H vs N

MF

8

0.005337

peroxiredoxin activity (GO:0051920)

H vs N

MF

1

0.017815