Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of differentially expressed contigs between mantle tissue sections and annotation levels

From: Transcriptomic analysis of shell repair and biomineralization in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis

Comparison

Differential expression

Annotationb

Tissue in which genes are more highly expressed

FDRa <=0.001

SwissProt

Trembl

SMP database

Undamaged valve: mantle edge vs. central mantle

Mantle edge

8,955

2,293

4,001

220

Central mantle

7,221

3,128

3,780

23

Damaged valve: mantle edge vs. central mantle

Mantle edge

7,340

2,039

3,484

155

Central mantle

6,229

2,614

3,144

28

Central mantle: Damaged vs. undamaged valve

Damaged valve

653

131

236

54

Undamaged valve

0

0

0

0

Mantle edge: Damaged vs. undamaged valve

Damaged valve

0

0

0

0

Undamaged valve

0

0

0

0

  1. aFDR False Discovery Rate
  2. bnumber of putative genes with annotation derived through sequence similarity searches of the stated databases