Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular machineries of ciliogenesis, cell survival, and vasculogenesis are differentially expressed during regeneration in explants of the demosponge Halichondria panicea

BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 858 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Sponges are interesting animal models for regeneration studies, since even from dissociated cells, they are able to regenerate completely. In particular, explants are model systems that can be applied to many sponge species, since small fragments of sponges can regenerate all elements of the adult, including the oscula and the ability to pump water. The morphological aspects of regeneration in sponges are relatively well known, but the molecular machinery is only now starting to be elucidated for some sponge species. Here, we have used an explant system of the demosponge Halichondria panicea to understand the molecular machinery deployed during regeneration of the aquiferous system. We sequenced the transcriptomes of four replicates of the 5–day explant without an osculum (NOE), four replicates of the 17–18–day explant with a single osculum and pumping activity (PE) and also four replicates of field–collected individuals with regular pumping activity (PA), and performed differential gene expression analysis. We also described the morphology of NOE and PE samples using light and electron microscopy. Our results showed a highly disorganised mesohyl and disarranged aquiferous system in NOE that is coupled with upregulated pathways of ciliogenesis, organisation of the ECM, and cell proliferation and survival. Once the osculum is formed, genes involved in “response to stimulus in other organisms” were upregulated. Interestingly, the main molecular machinery of vasculogenesis described in vertebrates was activated during the regeneration of the aquiferous system. Notably, vasculogenesis markers were upregulated when the tissue was disorganised and about to start forming canals (NOE) and angiogenic stimulators and ECM remodelling machineries were differentially expressed once the aquiferous system was in place (PE and PA). Our results are fundamental to better understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of the aquiferous system in sponges, and its similarities with the early onset of blood-vessel formation in animal evolution.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Morphogenesis and regeneration are central aspects of animal biology since these are the fundamental processes by which a tissue, organ, or organism develops its shape. The ability to regenerate a lost body part is relatively common across the animal tree of life, but whole-body regeneration (WBR) is less frequent [1, 2]. Epimorphosis involves regenerating from a blastema of undifferentiated cells and usually includes proliferative cellular stages, like the regeneration of a limb, while morphallaxis regenerates the tissue with pre-existing cells and no cell proliferation, like it occurs in Hydra [3]. Besides epimorphosis and morphallaxis, metaplasia is another regenerative mechanism that involves transdifferentiation of cells [4], although this mechanism is considered rare in the animal kingdom [1]. However, the boundaries between epimorphic, morphallactic and metaplastic regeneration are often difficult to establish, with some organisms showing features of both, and many authors tend to avoid this terminology [5]. Because regeneration has important implications for modern medicine, much research has been carried out, advancing our understanding of the physiological and molecular underpinnings of the process. From the resulting large body of research, common patterns are starting to emerge: such as re-epithelization; involvement of matrix metalloproteinases, enzymes to degrade or remodel the extracellular matrix; bioelectric events (e.g. ion fluxes or membrane voltage changes) and immune responses triggered at the onset of regeneration; cell signaling pathways, especially Wnt and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling; and the role of innervation [1]. Whole-body regeneration is considered to be the ancestral mode of regeneration, and it has its most striking examples in sponges, ctenophores, cnidarians, and placozoans [1, 6].

Sponges (phylum Porifera) are fundamental to understanding the origins of basic biological processes because even though they show relative molecular complexity, they have fewer specialised cell types than most other phyla, and these retain a pluripotency unparalleled in almost all other phyla [7,8,9]. But also, they are key because of their crucial position among the earliest diverging animals (see [10, 11] for the latest analyses). As mentioned, sponges possess a large body of stem or pluripotent cells, which are behind their enormous regeneration capacities [9]. Indeed, in sponges, all types of regeneration have been described [6], but the most striking among them is perhaps the ability to undergo somatic embryogenesis (or formation of an individual using “somatic” cells) after complete dissociation into component cell types, often also referred to as reaggregation [6, 12,13,14]. Remarkably, even from cell cultures containing only archaeocytes, sponges are able to regenerate almost all tissues and layers of adult sponges in less than 24 hours, highlighting the totipotent nature of archaeocytes [15]. Similarly, when using larval cell cultures containing mostly archaeocytes, the sponges are formed within 3–4 days [16]. However, when the cell culture contains mostly choanocytes, they never reaggregate to reorganise a functional sponge [17, 18].

During their life, sponges undergo shape shifts, regeneration of body parts, cell transdifferentiation, and budding almost routinely, but they are also capable of whole-body regeneration, although this is most likely only occurring in experimental conditions. Such regenerative plasticity has been coined as “chronic morphogenesis” [6], and it is at the core of the ecological and evolutionary success of sponges. The morphological basis of sponge regeneration patterns have been studied profusely in the last two centuries, from first reports in the early twentieth century [19], to complex descriptions of the process in the recent years [5, 6, 14, 20, 21]. Sponge regeneration can go through epithelial–to–mesenchymal transformations, where epithelial cells (mostly pinacocytes and choanocytes) transdifferentiate into other cell types to regenerate the sponge body, and mesenchymal–to–epithelial transformations, where archaeocytes and other somatic cells are the ones transdifferentiating into epithelial cells (reviewed in Ereskovsky et al., 2021). However, the molecular aspects of all these types of sponge regeneration are definitely less well-known [22,23,24,25].

Halichondria panicea is a common intertidal sponge in the North Atlantic Ocean, which has previously been the subject of regeneration studies characterising the morphological processes during the regeneration of the sponge body (“explant”) from small body fragments of parent sponges [26, 27]. Usually, the initial explant contains all or most tissue elements of the parent sponge, including epithelia, choanoderm, mesohyl with extracellular matrix (ECM), and the pinacoderm lining the aquiferous system [6]. During the regenerative process, the explants rearrange the polarity of their body in order to position their osculum in the direction of the flow [28]. The main steps of regeneration in the explants are: epithelization of the wound surfaces, disintegration of the aquiferous system, cell de-differentiation, loss of polarity and symmetry, attachment to the substrate, reestablishment of polarity, and finally restoration of the aquiferous system including the formation of the exhalant opening known as the osculum [6, 28]. The molecular aspects of this complex process of regeneration are poorly known, with descriptions of the process in just a few sponge species so far [14, 23, 25], hampering our understanding of the transcriptional processes behind regeneration in such a plastic animal. Here, we address such dearth of molecular data on regenerative processes in sponges by using an RNAseq approach in H. panicea during explant regeneration, including two steps of the process: once epithelization is complete but polarity, osculum, and aquiferous system are absent (NOE) and once the aquiferous system is reformed, the polarity re-established, and the explant is pumping (PE). We compared the expression levels of the whole transcriptome between these two stages and also to intact sponges with full pumping activity (PA) living in their natural habitat (Fig. 1A-C). Our results are discussed in the context of existing literature of regeneration in sponges and other animals with extensive regenerative capacities.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Explant experimental design and results of the gene expression analysis during aquiferous system remodeling in Halichondria panicea. a Five-day explant without osculum (NOE). b Explant with osculum (arrow) and pumping activity (PE). c Field-collected adult sponge with pumping activity (PA). d Heatmap showing differential gene expression among the three conditions of the experiment: NOE, PE and PA

Full size image

Materials and methods

Sampling and explant formation

Intact, actively water-pumping adult specimens (PA) of the demosponge Halichondria panicea with widely open exhalant openings were collected from the inlet to Kerteminde Fjord, Denmark (55°26′59″N, 10°39′40″E), and were instantly processed into explants at the nearby Marine Biological Research Center. Explants were obtained from cuttings (5–10 mm3), which were prepared and cultivated according to [28]. Cuttings adhered to glass slides in flow-through aquaria with aerated bio-filtered seawater (15–25 psu, 15 °C), and regenerated their epithelial exopinacoderm within 3–5 days, as seen from smoothing of the explants’ periphery and edges (Fig. 1A). We defined these stages as ‘no-osculum explants’ (NOE), in which an osculum and thus, a fully functional water canal system is not yet developed. The formation of a venting osculum in attached explants during the next 15–18 days indicated remodelling of the internal aquiferous system and filter-feeding (Fig. 1B). These stages were defined as ‘explants with a single osculum and pumping activity’ (PE). Active water pumping in PE, NOE and PA was tested by adding fluorescein dye (Sigma-Aldrich) to the sponge surface prior to sampling for histological and transcriptomic analyses. PE explants were fed with Rhodomonas salina algae and a mix of bacteria that grew within the algal culture.

Light and Electron microscopy

Samples of NOE (n = 4), PE (n = 4), and PA (n = 4) were fixed in formalin 4% and another batch in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.4 M PBS + 0.34 M NaCl (pH 7.4, at 25 °C) for histological examination and detailed observation of the tissue organisation. Formalin-preserved samples were rinsed in distilled water while glutaraldehyde-preserved samples were rinsed in 0.4 M PBS + 0.6 M NaCl for at least 1 hour, followed by the removal of the spicule’s silica in 5% hydrofluoric acid in distilled water over 5 hours, and then rinsed in distilled water until further processing.

For light microscopy, formalin-preserved samples were dehydrated through a series of ethanol of increasing concentration from 70 to 100%. Samples were then soaked in xylene for 30 min and embedded in paraffin at 58 °C overnight. Sections 5 μm thick were cut using a Microm HM 325 Rotary microtome (ThermoFisher Scientific) and stained using standard hematoxylin-eosin or toluidine blue protocols. In 10 sections of each sample, we quantified the number of archaeocytes, amboeboid cells, and choanocytes (free and in chambers) per 0.01mm2.

For electron microscopy, samples were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide and dehydrated through an ethanol series of increasing concentration from 70 to 100%. For Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), samples were further critical point-dried, carbon-coated (20 nm), and imaged in a Zeiss Ultra Plus Field Emission Electron Microscope at the Natural History Museum of London (NHM). For Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), samples were embedded in Spurr resin for at least 3 days. Thin sections were cut with an ULTRACUT-T Leica ultramicrotome, stained with 2% lead citrate and 2% uranyl acetate and observed with a Hitachi H-7650 TEM at Kew Gardens, operating at 80 kV.

RNA extraction and RNAseq library preparation

Total RNA was extracted using a standard Trizol-based method using TRI Reagent (Life Sciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequent mRNA purification was performed with a Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen) also following the manufacturer’s protocol. Twelve different cDNA libraries (NOE = 4, PE = 4, PA = 4) were constructed with the ScriptSeq v2 kit (Illumina), and sequenced alongside other samples in a single flowcell of Illumina NextSeq 500, at 150 bp paired-end read length.

Transcriptome assembly and annotation

We first checked the original quality of the raw reads with FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics) and processed all the libraries to remove adaptor sequences. Trimmomatic [29] was used to remove areas of sequence with low Phred scores (below 28), smaller than 30 base pairs, and complete sequences with overall low quality. Only the paired reads resulting from the trimming process were used to construct a de novo reference transcriptome using Trinity 2.4.0 [30] with all the default options. Raw reads can be accessed at the Short Read Archive (SRA) under Bioproject number PRJNA374707 (Accession numbers SRR1857509-SRR1857520). Completeness of the reference transcriptome was obtained using BUSCO [31] and the conserved eukaryotic and metazoan gene complements.

To annotate our transcripts, we used DIAMOND [32] against two different databases, i.e. Refseq and Swissprot (last accessed in September 2020), and retained only the best hit with an e-value threshold of 10− 5 for both cases. To obtain Gene Ontology (GO) terms, we ran Blast2GO PRO [33] and used the gene identities obtained both for Refseq and Swissprot separately, and collected the GO terms for Biological Process, Molecular Function and Cellular Component with the GOSlim function.

Differential gene expression

The expression levels for the genes of all samples from different stages (NOE, PE, and PA) were obtained by mapping the clean reads (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1) from individual replicates to the reference assembly using RSEM [34] within the Trinity module [30]. We used the count table (for the genes) to further analyse the differential (pairwise) comparative expression of the three stages using the Bioconductor package edgeR [35] as part of the Trinity module [30]. We selected only those differentially expressed genes (DEG) with fold change over 2 and corrected p-values < 0.0001.

We performed a GO enrichment analysis with Blast2GO using the DGEs for each of the conditions against the whole reference transcriptome and plotted only those with a corrected p-value of 0.001. In addition, we used REVIGO [36] to visualise the main GO term categories associated with those DGEs obtained with edgeR. Finally, we also constructed gene networks of the DGEs in Genemania [37].

Phylogenetic analyses

We performed separate phylogenetic analyses of the fibroblast and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (FGFR and VEGFR respectively), tubulin (alpha, beta and delta), and myosins present in vertebrates and invertebrates, including sponges (see Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 3). We used the translated protein from the transcripts that blasted against these genes in H. panicea and aligned them with other orthologs from vertebrates and invertebrates (see Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 3) using the MUSCLE [38] aligner in SeaView [39] and then selecting for conserved regions with Gblocks 0.91b [40]. Phylogenetic inference with Maximum Likelihood was performed using RAxML-NG 1.0.3 [41].

Results and discussion

Morphological changes during tissue regeneration in Halichondria panicea explants

We observed extensive tissue regeneration during the transition of explants from ‘no-osculum’(NOE) to ‘water pumping’ stages with an osculum (PE; Fig. 1A-B). In NOE, chambers were disassembled, as seen by individual choanocytes in the mesohyl (Figs. 2A–C and 3A, C–D, F), some of them without a flagellum, which may have been disarranged. The aquiferous system was almost completely disarranged (Figs. 2A–B, 3B), although few canals seemed to remain intact in the mesohyl. Alternatively, these canals might have been newly formed. All 3 NOE individuals lacked subdermal cavities, the exopinacoderm was immediately followed by a high-density cellular organisation of the mesohyl, with a high degree of cell compaction (Fig. 2A), and it completely lacked choanocyte chambers or only few disarranged choanocyte chambers (Fig. 2A–B, 3C–D). The structural organisation of adult sponges (PA), previously described by Reiswig [42] and Barthel [43] and highly similar to PE sponges (Fig. 2D–F), was completely different to the disorganised tissue we found in NOE (Fig. 2A, 3A). During tissue remodelling, NOE sponges had mostly archaeocytes, amoeboid cells in the mesohyl (Fig. 3A–B, E–F), and few choanocytes, both with (Fig. 3C) and without a flagellum (Fig. 3D; Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 4). Choanocytes without flagella still retained similar features as those with the flagellum, including anucleolated nucleus and digestive vesicles, although some showed a larger cell body and a nucleolus (Fig. 3F). Such high numbers of archaeocytes and ameboid cells were not observed in PE and PA sponges (Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 4). In PE explants, choanocytes were observed in clusters or forming new chambers in the mesohyl (Fig. 2C). Also at the PE stage, an osculum and subdermal cavities were present (Fig. 2D), along with complete functional choanocyte chambers (Fig. 2E–F), and an aquiferous system including interconnected in- and excurrent canals (Fig. 2F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Histological sections of the aquiferous system of Halichondria panicea using light microscopy a No osculum explant (NOE) with a few intact canals (ca). b No osculum explant (NOE) with an intact canal (ca). White arrows indicate archaeocytes. c Pumping explant (PE) showing choanocytes aggregated and forming chambers in the mesohyl (black arrows) and archaeocytes (white arrow) close to canals (ca). d Pumping explant (PE) with a fully organized aquiferous system, including pinacoderm layer (pd), subdermal membrane (sd), canals (ca), and choanocyte chambers (black arrows). e Pumping explant (PE) showing choanocyte chambers (black arrows) and some aggregates of choanocytes (white arrows). Inset: Close up of a choanocyte chamber (black arrows) located near two canals (ca) lined by pinacocytes (pi). f Pumping explant (PE) with fully organized aquiferous system: choanocyte chambers (black arrows) and canals (ca)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Ultrastructure of ‘no-osculum explants’ (NOE) with electron microscopy. a SEM micrograph showing disarrayed choanocyte chambers (black arrows) and abundance of collagen (co). b Canal (ca) lined by a flat pinacocyte (pi) with an archaeocyte (ar) in the vicinity. c Single choanocyte (black arrow) from a disarrayed chamber with the flagellum oriented towards the mesohyl where spicules lie (sp). d Disarrayed choanocytes (black arrows) in the mesohyl. e Archaeocyte with digestive vesicle (dv) containing several types of prokaryotes (white arrows), and a nucleolated nucleus (n). f Choanocyte chamber organized with choanocytes (ch) in close contact. Note the absence of flagella and archaeocytes (ar) in the vicinity and the nucleolated nucleus in one of the choanocytes (white arrow)

Full size image

Assembly, mapping and differential gene expression

We obtained 327 million raw reads that were subsequently trimmed (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1). The reference assembly of Halichondria panicea was constructed with approximately 245 million clean reads (Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1A) and resulted in 208,269 assembled transcripts (N50 1047 nt, see Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1), corresponding to 67,844 protein-coding genes. Our BUSCO analysis recovered 99% of the eukaryotic conserved cassette and 96.1% of the metazoan cassette (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1). Between 30 and 78% of the clean reads were mapped uniquely to the reference transcriptome per sample (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1). Only 37% of the assembled sequences obtained a diamond hit against the refseq database, and 99% of those with a diamond hit had associated GO terms (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1).

Two samples (NOE_rep4 and PE_rep1) were discarded because their expression pattern was extremely divergent with respect to the other samples of the same stage (Additional file 2: Supplementary Figs. 2). These disparities were probably due to different timings of sampling and/or developmental stages during the experimental design. Three samples from NOE (NOE_rep1, 2, and 3) were cultured in May, 2016, whilst NOE_rep4 was cultured in September, 2016. It is possible that the sponges sampled for the preparation of explants in May were in a different physiological state than those collected in September, which lies within the reproductive period of this species in the same collection area [44]. Thus, sampling of our H. panicea sponges during the reproductive season (autumn) may have added too much noise to the analysis. Furthermore, we also observed a much faster development of the osculum in explant PE_rep1 (~ 10 days) compared to explants PE_rep2, PE_rep3 and PE_rep4 (17–18 days), which could explain the different expression patterns between these samples (Additional file 5: Supplementary Fig. 2). Removing NOE_rep4 and PE_rep1 resulted in more similar expression levels among samples in each stage (Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1B–C).

A total of 1051 transcripts were upregulated (only 293 with significant diamond hit ID against the databases, hereafter referred as hit ID) and 638 were downregulated (only 261 with hit ID) in PE vs. NOE (Fig. 1D, Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2). When comparing NOE vs. PA, 1328 transcripts were upregulated (only 243 with hit ID) in PA and 1121 transcripts downregulated (only 488 with hit ID) in PA (Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2). In contrast, only 91 transcripts were upregulated (only 24 with hit ID) in PE when compared to PA, and 312 downregulated (only 48 with blast ID) (Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2).

Changes in gene expression during tissue regeneration

Ciliogenesis and ECM remodelling in NOE

In demosponges, transdifferentiation, including both epithelial–to–mesenchymal (EMT) and mesenchymal–to–epithelial (MET) morphogenesis, is the most widespread regenerative processes [6], with pinacocytes and choanocytes (flagellated cells) acting as main cell sources in the EMT morphogenesis and mostly archaeocytes transdifferentiating during MET morphogenesis. Although cell proliferation increases progressively during regeneration in other sponge species [21, 22], such process seems not to be the central mechanism involved in the regeneration of the wounds. Here in the NOE stage of H. panicea, we notably observed a massive decrease in canal structures and almost no choanocyte chambers (Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 4). The few choanocytes we observed lacked flagella and were part of disarranged chambers or free (Figs. 2A–B, 3A–C; Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 4). In addition, in NOE samples, we noticed a high density of archaeocytes (Fig. 2A–B) containing numerous digestive vesicles (Fig. 3E–F). Indeed, there were twice the number of archaeocytes per mm2 in the tissue of NOE individuals compared to both PE and PA (Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 4). In contrast, in PE samples, we found chambers with flagellated choanocytes and canals lined with flattened pinacocytes (Fig. 2C–D), indicating the progressive reconstruction of the aquiferous system. Furthermore, in PE, the formation of an osculum (Fig. 1A) indicated the presence of a fully developed aquiferous system (Fig. 3C-D), confirmed by our observation of active water-pumping in these explants [28, 45]. It remains unresolved if the choanocytes without flagellum observed in our morphological study of NOE (Fig. 3D, F) migrate through the mesohyl until they find chambers to join and then they rebuild their flagellum in the PE stages, like previously shown in explants of Spongilla lacustris [46], or if chambers in PE consist of entirely ‘new’ choanocytes which differentiated from a single or a conundrum of archaeocytes like it occurs during metamorphosis or asexual reproduction in other sponges (e.g., [47, 48]). However, assembly and disassembly of the flagellum is quite a common phenomenon in all organisms, from single-cell algae and sponges to mammals [49]. In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, for instance, many environmental stimuli can trigger the disassembly of the flagellum [50]. Loss of flagellum could either be achieved by either resorption or deflagellation, which is in fact triggered by stress in many invertebrates [51]. In Aplysina cavernicola and Oscarella lobularis, during metaplasic regeneration, new flagella were formed in old choanocytes using their basal bodies which were not completely resorbed [5, 21]. In our RNASeq results, we found highly enriched functions in NOE compared to PE related to cilium formation, including polymeric cytoskeletal fibre, cilium, motile cilium, ciliary part, microtubule, cilium assembly, cilium organisation, cell projection assembly, and microtubule-based process (Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1D). Many genes responsible for the correct formation and function of the flagellum, as previously observed in proteotranscriptomic studies of ciliogenesis of flagellated unicellular eukaryotes (reviewed in [47]), were upregulated in NOE, including tubulin-α and tubulin-ß, dyneins, outer dense fiber 2, radial spoke head 6, rootletin, cilia- and flagella-associated proteins, and kinesin KIF9 (Fig. 4, Additional file 7: Supplementary Fig. 4). Kinesin and dynein proteins are important for intraflagellar transport (IFT) (Fig. 4 Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2, Additional file 7: Supplementary Fig. 4), while tubulins are the main structural proteins of the flagellum microtubules; radial spoke heads are connecting proteins between the outer and the inner microtubules, and rootletins are part of the anchoring system and fundamental for maintenance of the flagellum [52]. Interestingly, during the course of flagellar assembly, α- and ß-tubulins are upregulated in the model system Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, but return to basal levels once the flagellum is formed [52]. It is important to note here, that while several transcripts of tubulin-α and tubulin-ß were upregulated in PE and PA, other transcripts with the same annotation were upregulated instead in NOE (Fig. 4, Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2, Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 3C). Other genes related to the structure and maintenance of the flagellum were also found upregulated in NOE, such as MAPK MAK MRK overlapping kinase (MOK) which negatively regulates cilium length [53], and tektin-1, which is involved in the stability and structural complexity of the flagellum [54].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Differentially expressed genes related to ciliogenesis, stress, contractility, and sensory functions. Genes names are abbreviated and full names can be found in Additional file 7: Supplementary Fig. 4. GO terms are shown on the left side with parent categories on the right. The detailed structure of the flagellum is shown on the right side of the figure

Full size image

Many other genes traditionally related to the maturation of sperm and capacitation were also upregulated, such as parkin, testis-specific serine threonine- kinases 1 and 2, and cation channel sperm-associated 2 [55]. Overall, these molecular and morphological results indicate that flagella are formed in choanocytes in NOE, regardless of them being newly formed choanocytes (indicating cell proliferation) or pre-existing cells without flagella, as observed in our morphological analysis of NOE.

Besides ciliogenesis, the synthesis and deposition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are fundamental to maintain the tissue polarity and function. Many markers of ECM deployment were upregulated in NOE (Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1E and Additional file 5: Supplementary Fig. 2), but others were engaged later (in PE) when reorganisation of the tissues and the aquiferous system was completed (Fig. 5). This is similar to the regeneration processes described in other demosponge species, such as O. lobularis and H. caerulea [5, 23], where ECM condensation and reorganisation occur very early in the process (sometimes only 2–3 hr. after injury) but can extend until the wound is completely healed.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Differentially expressed genes related to angiogenesis/vasculogenesis and ECM organization. GO terms are shown on the left side with parent categories on the right. b TEM micrograph of a spongocyte secreting collagen fibers (white arrows). C. SEM micrograph of a spongocyte secreting collagen fibers

Full size image

Cell proliferation and cell survival

Interestingly, the GO categories (within Biological Process) most frequent among the DE genes in the pumping explant’ stage (PE) were ‘response to ethanol’ and ‘macrophage differentiation’ when compared to the ‘no-osculum explant’ stage (NOE; Fig. 6, Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1E), and ‘apoptotic signaling pathway’ when compared to the intact, actively pumping sponges (PA) collected from the field (Fig. 6, Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1F, J–I); this latter category contains mostly subcategories related to immune responses and cell death or survival. Similarly, during regeneration in the demosponge Halisarca caerulea, apoptotic processes were found to be fundamental for regenerating injured tissues [23, 25]. Within these groups of DE genes, we identified a number of homologs of genes that have been linked to regulated cell death in sponges and other animals.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Differentially expressed cell death-related genes in Halichondria panicea. a Heatmap showing differentially expressed genes with predicted functions in regulated cell death, and GO terms associated with cell death (blue), its negative regulation (yellow), or both (pink) (Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2). b Schematic figure showing selected products of differentially expressed genes mapped onto regulated cell death pathways. Blue, pathway components linked to regulated cell death induction in sponges and/or other animals. Yellow, pathway components linked to regulated cell death inhibition. Pink, pathway components linked to both induction and inhibition of regulated cell death. Grey, pathway components encoded in the H. panicea transcriptome, but not differentially expressed in our study. Dotted lines indicate partial sequences that lack information about specific domains in H. panicea that are found in vertebrate homologs. APAF-1, Apoptotic protease activating factor 1; Bak, Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer; BHP, Bcl-2 homologous protein; DAMPs, damage-associated molecular patterns; DEATH, Death fold motif found in some proteins implicated in regulated cell death and inflammation; FADD-like, Fas-associated death domain protein-like; HIG, hypoxia-inducible domain-containing protein; MAMPs, microbe-associated molecular patterns; MAPK, Mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-κB, Nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; TNF, Tumour necrosis factor; NLR-like, NOD-like receptor; TNFR, Tumour necrosis factor receptor; TRAFs, Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors

Full size image

Despite their position as the possible sister group to all animals, sponges possess many of the same characteristic genes implicated in regulating cell death processes in other animals. These include the apoptotic initiator and executioner proteases known as caspases; pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, which trigger or block the release of mitochondrial cytochrome C upstream of caspase activation in intrinsic apoptosis; and tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family members [56], which trigger caspase activation through the action of adapter molecules in extrinsic apoptosis (Fig. 6, Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2 and Additional file 8: Supplementary Table 3).

In sponges, regeneration often involves cell proliferation and migration of the stem cell pool (archaeocytes and choanocytes), but transdifferentiation has also been described [5, 6, 57, 58]. Here, we have identified several markers of cell proliferation that appear to be upregulated during relatively early phases of regeneration (NOE) (Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2, Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1G). These include genes involved in nuclear division as well as TNF receptor-associated factor 5 and Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase, which play important roles in cell proliferation in vascular tissues in other metazoans [59, 60]. Several caspases were downregulated in NOE relative to PE and PA, as was the inflammasome component NOD-like receptor family member (NLR), which detects microbe- or cellular stress-associated molecules and initiates inflammatory responses via caspase activation [61]. In addition, we identified a gene downregulated in NOE that exhibited overall sequence similarity to the bilaterian Fas-associated death domain (FADD) genes; FADD proteins interact with members of the Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor (TNFR) family (which was also downregulated in NOE) and activate downstream apoptotic caspases. Other sponges encode the pro-apoptotic protein DD2, which comprises two death domains and has sequence similarity to both FADDs and the Fas ligand [62]. The FADD-like sequence encoded by the Halichondria panicea transcriptome was partial, such that we could not determine whether it presents the domain architecture of DD2 or of the FADDs found in other animals.

Consistent with these findings, genes upregulated in NOE included several proteins implicated in cell survival, such as the apoptosis-suppressing erythroblast macrophage protein (EMP) [63], a member of the hypoxia-inducible domain-containing protein family, which promotes cell survival under anoxic conditions [64], and the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2-homologous protein (BHP) [65, 66]. Cathepsin L, which, in human cells, may inhibit the BHP by cleaving it [67], was also downregulated in NOE.

Several unknown proteins containing death domains, which in bilaterians mediate protein-protein interactions in a subset of proteins that function in cell death and immunity, were identified in the Halichondria panicea transcriptome. Consistent with the diverse functions of death domain proteins in promoting either cell death or survival [68], many of these proteins were upregulated in PA and PE compared to NOE, while one was upregulated in NOE (Fig. 6, Additional file 6: Supplementary Tables 2 and Additional file 8: Supplementary Tables 3). Similarly, the TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family includes both positive and negative regulators of cell death and innate immunity in bilaterian model organisms [69, 70], with some members functioning in promoting either survival or death depending on cleavage status [71]. Some TRAFs were found upregulated (n = 5) or while others were downregulated (n = 15) in NOE (Fig. 6, Additional file 6: Supplementary Tables 2 and Additional file 8: Supplementary Tables 3). Interestingly, during the later regenerative phase in Halisarca caerulea, TNF receptor factor 3 was found to be upregulated [23].

Taken together, our results suggest that at the point when explants have regenerated their epithelia, i.e. 3–5 days after dissection, they exhibit increased expression of genes linked to cell survival, and repression of genes linked to cell death. This is consistent with earlier reports of apoptosis taking place following dissection in the demosponges Aplysina cavernicola [21] and Halisarca caerulea [23]. In those sponges, two waves of apoptosis take place, 6–12 hours and 48–72 hours post-operation in A. cavernicola and 2 hours and 12 hours post-operation in H. caerulea. Thus, in these examples both waves of apoptosis are complete before the time at which our NOE were sampled, consistent with a shift towards a pro-survival expression profile such as the one we report here.

Remodelling of the aquiferous system: Vasculogenesis- and angiogenesis-like processes in explant regeneration

Sponge morphology and body plan are phylogenetically constrained but they are also modulated to a certain extent by the environment [72,73,74]. For instance, changes in the water flow can induce reorganisation of the aquiferous system to improve filter-feeding and oxygen supply [75]. One of the most dramatic events promoting body remodelling in sponges is the removal of the osculum (where the exhalant current is released), which is considered as the primary organiser of the body plan in sponges [75,76,77,78]. In the absence of an osculum, such as in our NOE stage, the aquiferous system experiences a profound reorganisation until water flow is re-established and the current leaves the sponge body through a newly formed osculum. Interestingly, during the regeneration of the aquiferous system in H. panicea in our experiments, several genes of the molecular toolkit involved in vertebrate blood vessel formation were found upregulated (Fig. 5). As mentioned before, such regeneration of the aquiferous system included choanocyte chamber, canal and osculum formation processes. In vertebrates, blood vessels are formed through two processes called vasculogenesis, or de novo formation of endothelial cells, and angiogenesis, in which new vessels sprout from endothelial cells in pre-existing vessels [79]. Hypoxia is the primary physiological trigger for vessel formation, and this process is regulated first by chemotaxis and recruitment of endothelial cells during vasculogenesis, followed by angiogenesis regulated via both stimulators and inhibitors [80]. In general, vertebrate quiescent endothelial cells become activated by angiogenic signals (VEGF, growth factors, cytokines and chemokines [NO_PRINTED_FORM]), which results in degradation of the basement membrane, proliferation and migration of endothelial cells towards the angiogenic stimulus [81, 82]. These endothelial cells finally form a new basement membrane as well as ECM, and recruit perivascular cells to form a new, functional vessel [82] .

In our experiments, genes with important roles in the formation of new blood vessels (or vasculogenesis), such as vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin [83], were differentially upregulated in NOE (Fig. 5). These chemokine proteins attract endothelial cells to start the formation of new blood vessels [83, 84]. Among the vertebrate stimulators of both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, the most important are the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, i.e. VEGF-R1 [85], together with ephrin and the ephrin ligands [86]. In turn, both vasohibin-1 and the interplay between semaphorin and plexin-D1 count among the inhibitors of the sprouting process [79, 87]. In marine demosponges, flagellar activity and fluid movement (or pressure differentials in the water canal system) act as stimuli for formation and modelling of the excurrent canals [88]. The aquiferous system of canals in sponges is far from being homologous to the vertebrate vessels, mainly (but not only) because sponges do not transport blood in their aquiferous system but environmental water. However, it is not unreasonable to think that the formation of tubular structures to canalise fluids in metazoans is similar in its molecular regulation and hypoxia–related triggering mechanisms across phyla. In fact, sponges such as our single-osculum H. panicea explants, regularly experience internal hypoxia, and even anoxia [89,90,91,92], due to contractions of the body including the osculum and water canal system [45, 93]. Also, regenerating explants without a functional aquiferous system, are unable to supply their interior with oxygen and nutrients via water-pumping, leaving major parts of the explant depleted of oxygen [89]. Indeed, we found both VEGF-R1 (Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 3A-B) as well as the angiogenic factors ephrin type B receptor 1 and ephrin type B receptor 2 more expressed (although not significantly) in NOE and PE explants than in PA, where the canals have been already well-formed (Fig. 5). In addition, the angiogenic inhibitor factors vasohibin-1 and plexin-D1 were differentially upregulated in NOE, when the canals were mostly disassembled (Figs. 2A–B, 5). It is important to note that although ephrin receptors are widely spread within sponges, their ligand, ephrin, has yet to be identified [94].

Other genes encoding proteins involved in signalling vessel formation through the Notch pathway, such as jagged 1 and galectin 3 [95] were differentially overexpressed in PE (Fig. 5). Although their role in the formation of the sponge aquiferous system is completely unknown, perhaps this whole array of stimulators and inhibitors of blood vessel formation have an ancestral role in positioning and forming canalicular systems in metazoans. Interestingly, even though invertebrates lack endothelial cells, the VEGF and VEGF-R molecules have proved to play a role in blood vessel formation in many invertebrate species [81, 82]. Furthermore, the VEGF-like factor of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is even able to induce angiogenesis in human cell cultures [96], suggesting the ancestral origin and high conservation of the mechanism. Although we cannot spatially resolve the expression of vascular genes in our experiments, the fact that the molecular machinery for vasculogenesis and angiogenesis is upregulated during remodelling of the aquiferous system in H. panicea explants is suggestive of a role in these processes.

In vertebrates, vasculogenesis and angiogenesis are accompanied by a reorganisation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), cell adhesion processes in the vessels, and formation of the basement membrane lining the vessels [NO_PRINTED_FORM]. During our explant regeneration experiments, we found evidence of a profound reorganisation of the tissue related to the synthesis and deposition of the ECM at both the morphological (Figs. 2–3) and molecular levels (Fig. 5, and Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1E). In fact, collencytes, which are specialised cells secreting collagen, were often observed in NOE (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, genes involved in reorganisation of the ECM during angiogenesis, such as integrin and filamin [97], were upregulated in NOE. Furthermore, we found ubiquitous genes in septate junctions, i.e. neuroglian and contactin, upregulated once regeneration has been mostly completed in (PE), as well as in non-manipulated sponges (PA) (Fig. 5A).

Finally, one of the main aspects related to hemal circulatory systems in invertebrates is the general contractility of the vessels, usually accomplished by myoepithelial cells [81, 82]. In Halichondria panicea, periods of osculum closure and body contractions have been observed in actively pumping explants [93]. The aquiferous system of H. panicea explants seems to be contractile in response to both GABA and L-glutamate stimuli [45], as in other demosponge species [78, 98, 99]. Indeed, in sponges, the Rho/ROCK pathway, its downstream components, and the myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC) of myosin II, which mediate actomyosin contractility [100, 101], regulate the correct formation of the aquiferous system [102]. In our study, myosin genes were highly upregulated in stages with an (already formed) aquiferous system, i.e. PE and PA (Fig. 4) and were found to belong to myosin I and II families (Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. 3C). Also, the gene twitchin, which, coupled with actin and myosin, is fundamental for the catch phase of contractions in molluscs [103], was highly upregulated in PE (Fig. 4, Additional file 6: Supplementary Table 2). Although we cannot resolve spatially the expression of these myosin genes, they are known to be expressed in pinacocytes lining the water canals and, to some extent, in archaeocytes, as previously shown in single-cell transcriptomic studies [104].

Response to stimulus once the osculum is formed

Sponge contractility and in general, sponge responses, are mostly triggered by amino acid signaling molecules [105]. In pumping explants (PE), GO categories involved in environmental stimuli sensing, including G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling pathways, response to biotic and external stimulus, response to other organisms, and transmembrane signalling receptor activity, were highly enriched (Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. 1D, H). In our DE dataset, we found heat shock proteins, GABA receptors, mGluRs, and nitric oxide synthase, upregulated in PE and PA compared to NOE (Fig. 4). Similarly, both GPCRs and GABA receptors were upregulated upon recovery from mechanical damage and grazing in the marine sponge Aplysina aerophoba [25]. In addition, other genes involved in sensing the environment, like several homologs of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily A member 1 (TRPA), were upregulated in sponges with an aquiferous system, both PE and PA in contrast to NOE (Fig. 4). This family of transient receptor potential ion channels is involved in several processes of environmental sensing, including chemical and temperature signals as well as mechanical stress [106]. In general, environmental receptors including metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), GABA receptors, and G–protein coupled receptors, are highly diversified in sponges [107]. Interestingly, TRPAs are highly expressed in choanocytes, while mGluRs and GABARs are more expressed in pinacocytes [104]. What is most interesting here, is that our data indicates that the sensory activity usually developed by the aquiferous system in sponges [78, 108, 109] is clearly upregulated when the aquiferous system is fully formed.

Conclusions

Recent comprehensive studies that combined morphological and molecular approaches, concluded that regeneration after complete dissociation, or whole–body regeneration, mimics post–larval development, at least in the calcareous sponge Sycon ciliatum [110]. Several pathways were common to both processes, including TGF-B, Notch, FGF, EGF, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways [110], which play a prominent role in the regeneration of other invertebrates [111] and wound healing in sponges [23, 25]. Interestingly, during regeneration from a wound injury in the demosponges Halisarca caerulea and complete dissociation in H. dujardini, these classical developmental pathways had a central role in the regeneration of the wounded tissue [14, 23]. However, our results of regeneration in Halichondria panicea demosponge explants paint an alternative transcriptional picture, with ciliogenetic, angiogenic, and apoptotic molecular machineries playing the most important roles in the regenerative processes. Several of these pathways were also found to be important in S. ciliatum, A. aerophoba, and H. caerulea though, including apoptosis and remodelling of the ECM [23, 25, 110]. But it is important to note that our study was performed 3–5 days after explant formation, and classic developmental pathways may have played roles in earlier stages of the regeneration, which were not covered in our experiments. Our study demonstrates a shift towards pro-survival expression profiles after explant attachment/reformation of outer epithelia, including the formation of the internal water canal system. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the presence of an intact, i.e. functional aquiferous system (as observed in our PE and PA stages) coincides with an upregulation of genes for contractile behaviour, probably in response to environmental stimuli, although further research is needed to understand whether contraction processes occur in the absence of a fully formed aquiferous system. Both the similarities and the differences in the molecular processes involved in regenerative mechanisms of sponges strongly suggest a very plastic genomic regulation of processes during regeneration. The phylogenetic constraints of regeneration in sponges may be dictating the molecular events necessary to remove damaged cells and rebuild the tissues: while deploying the post-larval development machinery could be fundamental for some sponge species, others, such as our H. panicea explants, may use an alternative strategy to achieve body polarity and the formation of a fully functional aquiferous system. But it is important to note that the timing of sampling during regeneration is key for comparing expression profiles and morphogenetic movements, and for this reason comparing our data to other datasets in the current literature is difficult. There are many future directions we see stemming from our study that may enable a more holistic assessment of this fascinating regenerative processes in sponges, including the following: 1. Comparative research across sponge taxa and the same experimental conditions, 2. Detailed studies on the specific timing of tissue morphogenesis for components such as the epithelium and the choanocyte chamber formation, and 3. Subtractive analysis of processes that might be occurring normally but not involving classic regeneration, such as natural cell proliferation, contraction, etc.

Availability of data and materials

Raw reads can be accessed at the Short Read Archive (SRA) under Bioproject number number PRJNA374707 (Accession numbers SRR1857509-SRR1857520).

References

  1. Bely AE, Nyberg KG. Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:161–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bideau L, Kerner P, Hui J, Vervoort M, Gazave E. Animal regeneration in the era of transcriptomics. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:3941–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sánchez AA. Regeneration in the metazoans: why does it happen? Bioessays. 2000;22:578–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vervoort M. Regeneration and development in animals. Biol Theory. 2011;6:25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ereskovsky AV, Borisenko IE, Lapébie P, Gazave E, Tokina D, Borchiellini C. Oscarella lobularis (Homoscleromorpha, Porifera) regeneration: epithelial morphogenesis and metaplasia. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ereskovsky A, Borisenko IE, Bolshakov FV, Lavrov AI. Whole-body regeneration in sponges: diversity, fine mechanisms, and future prospects. Genes. 2021;12:506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Srivastava M, Simakov O, Chapman J, Fahey B, Gauthier MEA, Mitros T, et al. The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature. 2010;466(7307):720–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Riesgo A, Farrar N, Windsor PJ, Giribet G, Leys SP. The analysis of eight transcriptomes from all poriferan classes reveals surprising genetic complexity in sponges. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:1102–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riesgo A, Solana J. Evolution of the animal germline: insights from animal lineages with remarkable regenerating capabilities. Orig Evol Metazoan Cell Types. 2021:47–74.

  10. Whelan NV, Kocot KM, Moroz TP, Mukherjee K, Williams P, Paulay G, et al. Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1737–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Redmond AK, McLysaght A. Evidence for sponges as sister to all other animals from partitioned phylogenomics with mixture models and recoding. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eerkes-Medrano D, Feehan CJ, Leys SP. Sponge cell aggregation: checkpoints in development indicate a high level of organismal complexity. Invertebr Biol. 2014;134:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lavrov AI, Kosevich IA. Sponge cell reaggregation: cellular structure and morphogenetic potencies of multicellular aggregates. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2016;325:158–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borisenko I, Bolshakov FV, Ereskovsky A, Lavrov AI. Expression of Wnt and TGF-Beta pathway components during whole-body regeneration from cell aggregates in the demosponge Halisarca dujardinii. Genes (Basel). 2021;12:944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buscema M, de Sutter D, van de Vyver G. Ultrastructural study of differentiation processes during aggregation of purified sponge archaeocytes. Wilhelm Roux’s Arch Dev Biol. 1980;188:45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borojevic R. Etude expérimentale de la différenciation des cellules de l’éponge au tours de son développement. Dev Biol. 1966;14:130–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Borojevic R. Essai de reconstitution du choanoderme a partir d’une suspension choanocytaire d’éponge acalcaire. C R l’Acad Sci Paris. 1963;257:961–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Sutter D, van de Vyver G. Aggregative properties of different cell types of the fresh-water sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis isolated on Ficoll gradients. Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1977;181:151–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson HV. On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc. 1907;23:161–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lavrov A, Bolshakov FV, Tokina DB, Ereskovsky A. Sewing up the wounds: the epithelial morphogenesis as a central mechanism of calcaronean sponge regeneration. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2018;330:351–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ereskovsky AV, Tokina DB, Saidov DM, Baghdiguian S, le Goff E, Lavrov AI. Transdifferentiation and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition during regeneration in Demospongiae (Porifera). J Exp Zool. 2020;334:37–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Funayama N. The cellular and molecular bases of the sponge stem cell systems underlying reproduction, homeostasis and regeneration. Int J Dev Biol. 2018;62:513–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kenny NJ, de Goeij JM, de Bakker DM, Whalen CG, Berezikov E, Riesgo A. Towards the identification of ancestrally shared regenerative mechanisms across the Metazoa: A transcriptomic case study in the demosponge Halisarca caerulea. Mar Genomics. 2018;37:135–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pozzolini M, Gallus L, Ghignone S, Ferrando S, Candiani S, Bozzo M, et al. Insights into the evolution of metazoan regenerative mechanisms: roles of TGF superfamily members in tissue regeneration of the marine sponge Chondrosia reniformis. J Exp Biol. 2019;222:1–17.

  25. Wu Y-C, Franzenburg S, Ribes M, Lucía P. Wounding response in Porifera (sponges) activates ancestral signaling cascades involved in animal healing, regeneration, and cancer. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Korotkova GP, Nikitin NS. The peculiarities of the morphogenesis during the development of cornacusponge Halichondria panicea from the small part of the body. In: Tokin BP, editor. Reconstruction processes and immunological reactions. Morphological investigations of different stages of development of the marine organisms. Leningrad: Nauka; 1969. p. 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Korotkova GP, Nikitin NS. The comparative morphological analysis of regeneration and somatic embryogenesis of the cornacusponge Halichondria panicea. In: Tokin BP, editor. Reconstructional processes and immunological reactions. Morphological investigations of different stages of development of the marine organisms. Leningrad: Nauka; 1969. p. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kumala L, Riisgard HU, Canfield DE. Osculum dynamics and filtration activity in small single-osculum explants of the demosponge Halichondria panicea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017;572:117–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Genome analysis Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Franz M, Rodriguez H, Lopes C, Zuberi K, Montojo J, Bader GD, et al. GeneMANIA update 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Galtier N, Gouy M, Gautier C. SeaView and Phylo_win, two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996;12:543–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56:564–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Reiswig HM. The aquiferous systems of three marine Demospongiae. J Morphol. 1975;145:493–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barthel D. Influence of different current regimes on the growth form of Halichondria panicea Pallas. Fossil Recent Sponges. 1991:387–94.

  44. Barthel D. On the ecophysiology of the sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel bight. I. Substrate specificity, growth and reproduction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1986;32:291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goldstein J, Bisbo N, Funch P, Riisgård HU. Contraction-expansion and the effects on the Aquiferous system in the demosponge Halichondria panicea. Front Mar Sci. 2020;7:113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kahn AS, Leys SP. The role of cell replacement in benthic–pelagic coupling by suspension feeders. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3:160484.

  47. Tanaka K, Watanabe Y. Choanocyte differentiation and morphogenesis of choanocyte chambers in the fresh-water sponge, Ephydatia fluviatilis, after reversal of developmental arrest caused by hydroxyurea. Zool Sci. 1984;1:561–70.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sogabe S, Nakanishi N, Degnan BM. The ontogeny of choanocyte chambers during metamorphosis in the demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica. Evodevo. 2016;7:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Quarmby LM, Parker JDK. Cilia and the cell cycle? J Cell Biol. 2005;169:707–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lefebvre PA, Rosenbaum JL. Regulation of the synthesis and assembly of ciliary and flagellar proteins during regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:517–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Quarmby LM. Cellular deflagellation. In: International review of cytology: A survey of cell biology; 2004. p. 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Diniz MC, Pacheco CL, Farias MK, de Oliveira MD. The eukaryotic flagellum makes the day: novel and unforeseen roles uncovered after post-genomics and proteomics data. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2012;13:524–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Broekhuis JR, Verhey KJ, Jansen G. Regulation of cilium length and intraflagellar transport by the RCK-kinases ICK and MOK in renal epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:108470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Takiguchi H, Murayama E, Kaneko T, Kurio H, Toshimori K, Iida H. Characterization and subcellular localization of Tektin 3 in rat spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:611–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hermo L, Pelletier R-M, Cyr DG, Smith CE. Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 3: developmental changes in spermatid flagellum and cytoplasmic droplet and interaction of sperm with the zona pellucida and egg plasma membrane. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;73:320–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wiens M, Müller WEG. Cell death in Porifera: molecular players in the game of apoptotic cell death in living fossils. Can J Zool. 2011;84:307–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Connes R, Diaz J, Negre G, Paris J. Étude morphologique, cytologique et sérologique de deux formes de Suberites massa de L’Étang de Thau. Vie Milieu. 1974;24:213–24.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Alexander BE, Achlatis M, Osinga R, van der Geest HG, Cleutjens JPM, Schutte B, et al. Cell kinetics during regeneration in the sponge Halisarca caerulea: how local is the response to tissue damage? PeerJ. 2015;2015:e820.

  59. Gaur U, Aggarwal BB. Regulation of proliferation, survival and apoptosis by members of the TNF superfamily. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:1403–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang P, Guan YF, Li WL, Lu GC, Liu JM, Miao CY. Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase facilitates post-stroke angiogenesis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015;21:475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yuen B, Bayes JM, Degnan SM. The characterization of sponge NLRs provides insight into the origin and evolution of this innate immune gene family in animals. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:106–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wiens M, Krasko A, Blumbach B, Müller IM, Müller WEG. Increased expression of the potential proapoptotic molecule DD2 and increased synthesis of leukotriene B4 during allograft rejection in a marine sponge. Cell Death Differ. 2000;7(5):461–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hanspal M, Smockova Y, Uong Q. Molecular identification and functional characterization of a novel protein that mediates the attachment of erythroblasts to macrophages. Blood. 1998;92:2940–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. An HJ, Shin H, Jo SG, Kim YJ, Lee JO, Paik SG, et al. The survival effect of mitochondrial Higd-1a is associated with suppression of cytochrome C release and prevention of caspase activation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2011;1813:2088–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wiens M, Belikov S, Kaluzhnaya OV, Krasko A, Schröder HC, Perovic-Ottstadt S, et al. Molecular control of serial module formation along the apical-basal axis in the sponge Lubomirskia baicalensis: silicateins, mannose-binding lectin and mago nashi. Dev Genes Evol. 2006;216:229–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wiens S, Perović-Ottstadt I, Müller WEG, Müller MM. Allograft rejection in the mixed cell reaction system of the demosponge Suberites domuncula is controlled by differential expression of apoptotic genes. Immunogenetics. 2004;56:597–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Droga-Mazovec G, Bojič L, Petelin A, Ivanova S, Romih R, Repnik U, et al. Cysteine cathepsins trigger caspase-dependent cell death through cleavage of bid and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 homologues. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:19140–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nanson JD, Kobe B, Ve T. Death, TIR, and RHIM: self-assembling domains involved in innate immunity and cell-death signaling. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;105:363–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Arch RH, Gedrich RW, Thompson CB. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs)—a family of adapter proteins that regulates life and death. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2821–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Elmetwali T, Young LS, Palmer DH. CD40 ligand-induced carcinoma cell death: A balance between activation of TNFR-associated factor (TRAF) 3-dependent death signals and suppression of TRAF6-dependent survival signals. J Immunol. 2010;184:1111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Irmler M, Steiner V, Ruegg C, Wajant H, Rg Tschopp J, Baggiolini M. Caspase-induced inactivation of the anti-apoptotic TRAF1 during Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 2000;468:129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bell JJ. Evidence for morphology-induced sediment settlement prevention on the tubular sponge Haliclona urceolus. Mar Biol. 2004;146:29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Leys SP, Yahel G, Reidenbach MA, Tunnicliffe V, Shavit U, Reiswig HM. The sponge pump: the role of current induced flow in the design of the sponge body plan. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. McMurray SE, Pawlik JR, Finelli CM. Trait-mediated ecosystem impacts: how morphology and size affect pumping rates of the Caribbean giant barrel sponge. Aquat Biol. 2014;23:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Leys SP, Hill A. The physiology and molecular biology of sponge tissues. Adv Mar Biol. 2012;62:1–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Mergner H. Über die Induktion neuer Oscularrohre bie Ephydatia fluviatilis. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org. 1964;155:9–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Windsor PJ, Leys SP. Wnt signaling and induction in the sponge aquiferous system: evidence for an ancient origin of the organizer. Evol Dev. 2010;12:484–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ludeman DA, Farrar N, Riesgo A, Paps J, Leys SP. Evolutionary origins of sensation in metazoans: functional evidence for a new sensory organ in sponges. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kim J, Oh WJ, Gaiano N, Yoshida Y, Gu C. Semaphorin 3E–Plexin-D1 signaling regulates VEGF function in developmental angiogenesis via a feedback mechanism. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1399–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia. 2015;3:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Muñoz-Chápuli R. Evolution of angiogenesis. Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55:345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Muñoz-Chápuli R, Quesada AR, Medina MÁ. Angiogenesis and signal transduction in endothelial cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:2224–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Koch AE, Halloran MM, Haskell CJ, Shah MR, Polverinii PJ. Angiogenesis mediated by soluble forms of E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Nature. 1995;376:517–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Oh IY, Yoon CH, Hur J, Kim JH, Kim TY, Lee CS, et al. Involvement of E-selectin in recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenesis in ischemic muscle. Blood. 2007;110:3891–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Risau W. Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 1997;386:671–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wang Y, Nakayama M, Pitulescu ME, Schmidt TS, Bochenek ML, Sakakibara A, et al. Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2010;465:483–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Sato Y. The vasohibin family: a novel family for angiogenesis regulation. J Biochem. 2013;153:5–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Simpson TL. The cell biology of sponges. New York: Springer; 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  89. Hoffmann F, Røy H, Bayer K, Hentschel U, Pfannkuchen M, Brümmer F, et al. Oxygen dynamics and transport in the Mediterranean sponge Aplysina aerophoba. Mar Biol. 2008;153:1257–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Lavy A, Keren R, Yahel G, Ilan M. Intermittent hypoxia and prolonged suboxia measured in situ in a marine sponge. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Leys SP, Kahn AS. Oxygen and the energetic requirements of the first multicellular animals. Integr Comp Biol. 2018;58:666–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kumala L, Larsen M, Glud RN, Canfield DE. Spatial and temporal anoxia in single-osculum Halichondria panicea demosponge explants studied with planar optodes. Mar Biol. 2021;168:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Kumala L, Canfield DE. Contraction dynamics and respiration of small single-osculum explants of the demosponge Halichondria panicea. Front Mar Sci. 2018;5:410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Krishnan A, Degnan BM, Degnan SM. The first identification of complete Eph-ephrin signalling in ctenophores and sponges reveals a role for neofunctionalization in the emergence of signalling domains. BMC Evol Biol. 2019;19:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Boareto M, Jolly MK, Ben-Jacob E, Onuchic JN. Jagged mediates differences in normal and tumor angiogenesis by affecting tip-stalk fate decision. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:E3836–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Tarsitano M, de Falco S, Colonna V, McGhee JD, Persico MG. The C. elegans pvf-1 gene encodes a PDGF/VEGF-like factor able to bind mammalian VEGF receptors and to induce angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2006;20:227–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Saharinen P, Ivaska J. Blocking integrin inactivation as an anti-angiogenic therapy. EMBO J. 2015;34:1293–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Elliott GRD, Leys SP. Coordinated contractions effectively expel water from the aquiferous system of a freshwater sponge. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:3736–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Leys SP. Elements of a ‘nervous system’ in sponges. J Exp Biol. 2015;218:581–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Maekawa M, Ishizaki T, Boku S, Watanabe N, Fujita A, Iwamatsu A, et al. Signaling from rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science. 1979;1999(285):895–8.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Watanabe T, Hosoya H, Yonemura S. Regulation of myosin II dynamics by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of its light chain in epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:605–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Schenkelaars Q, Quintero O, Hall C, Fierro-Constain L, Renard E, Borchiellini C, et al. ROCK inhibition abolishes the establishment of the aquiferous system in Ephydatia muelleri (Porifera, Demospongiae). Dev Biol. 2016;412:298–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Funabara D, Hamamoto C, Yamamoto K, Inoue A, Ueda M, Osawa R, et al. Unphosphorylated twitchin forms a complex with actin and myosin that may contribute to tension maintenance in catch. J Exp Biol. 2007;210:4399–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Sebé-Pedrós A, Chomsky E, Pang K, Lara-Astiaso D, Gaiti F, Mukamel Z, et al. Early metazoan cell type diversity and the evolution of multicellular gene regulation. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2(7):1176–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Leys SP, Mah JL, McGill PR, Hamonic L, De Leo FC, Kahn AS. Sponge Behavior and the Chemical Basis of Responses: A Post-Genomic View. Integr Comp Biol. 2019;59:751–64.

  106. Peng G, Shi X, Kadowaki T. Evolution of TRP channels inferred by their classification in diverse animal species. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;84:145–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kenny NJ, Francis WR, Rivera-Vicéns RE, Juravel K, de Mendoza A, Díez-Vives C, et al. Tracing animal genomic evolution with the chromosomal-level assembly of the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Renard E, Vacelet J, Gazave E, Lapébie P, Borchiellini C, Ereskovsky AV. Origin of the neuro-sensory system: new and expected insights from sponges. Integr Zool. 2009;4:294–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Mah JL, Leys SP. Think like a sponge: the genetic signal of sensory cells in sponges. Dev Biol. 2017;431:93–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Soubigou A, Ross EG, Touhami Y, Chrismas N, Modepalli V. Regeneration in the sponge Sycon ciliatum partly mimics postlarval development. Development. 2020;147:dev193714.

  111. Alvarado AS, Tsonis PA. Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:873–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to all members of the Riesgo Lab for their help during library construction and interpretation of the results. We also thank María Conejero for her help in TEM.

We are indebted to María Conejero for her help during preparation of samples for TEM and imaging, and Nathan Kenny, Sergio Taboada, Cristina Díez-Vives, Aida Verdes, and Bruna Plese for support during the analytical part of the study. This research was supported by VILLUM FONDEN through Grant No. 16518 to AR and PF and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through grants RYC2018–024247-I and PID2019-105769GB-I00 to AR.

Funding

This work was funded by two research grants (9278 and 16518) to PF and AR from the VILLUM FONDEN and a grant (8021-00392B) from the Independent Research Fund Denmark to PF. This study was further supported by two grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-105769GB-I00 and RYC2018–024247-I) to AR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain

    Ana Riesgo

  2. Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW5 7BD, UK

    Ana Riesgo & Nadia Santodomingo

  3. Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK

    Nadia Santodomingo

  4. Marine Symbioses Research Unit, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105, Kiel, Germany

    Vasiliki Koutsouveli

  5. Nordcee, Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark

    Lars Kumala

  6. Marine Biological Research Center, University of Southern Denmark, Hindsholmvej 11, 5300, Kerteminde, Denmark

    Lars Kumala

  7. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Paseo Marítimo de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    Michelle M. Leger

  8. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R3, Canada

    Sally P. Leys

  9. Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, 114-116, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Peter Funch

Authors
  1. Ana Riesgo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadia Santodomingo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vasiliki Koutsouveli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lars Kumala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michelle M. Leger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sally P. Leys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peter Funch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.R. and P.F. obtained the funding for the original idea. N.S., L.K., and V.K. performed the experiments. A.R., M.L. and S.L. interpreted the data. A.R. wrote the main manuscript with the help of M.L. A.R. and M.L. prepared the figures. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing and review. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Riesgo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have expressed consent for publication of the manuscript.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riesgo, A., Santodomingo, N., Koutsouveli, V. et al. Molecular machineries of ciliogenesis, cell survival, and vasculogenesis are differentially expressed during regeneration in explants of the demosponge Halichondria panicea. BMC Genomics 23, 858 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-022-09035-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12864-022-09035-0

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us