Table 6 Comparisons between Chinese Spring cDNA transcripts and assembled transcripts
From: Optimizing de novo common wheat transcriptome assembly using short-read RNA-Seq data
51,449 Chinese Spring (CS) ESTs | Trinity | Trans-ABySS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | AFSFASSS | AFSF + ASSS | AF + SF + AS + SS | AFSFASSS | AFSF + ASSS | AF + SF + AS + SS |
% of CS ESTs hit | 92.64% | 93.97% | 93.60% | 92.89% | 91.65% | 90.63% |
(% of bases covered) | 85.82% | 87.97% | 87.91% | 87.73% | 85.72% | 83.99% |
% of CS ESTs hit with at least 98% of identity | 51.56% | 65.21% | 76.07% | 73.98% | 71.58% | 69.19% |
(% of bases covered) | 59.46% | 65.15% | 69.54% | 81.52% | 79.25% | 77.08% |