Skip to main content

Table 2 Significant enrichments in clusters of the P. trichocarpa metabolic linkage network

From: Predicting whole genome protein interaction networks from primary sequence data in model and non-model organisms using ENTS

Cluster

Class

p-value

1 (31)

Phenylpropanoid derivatives biosynthesis (6)

4.105 × 10−11

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis (8)

5.815 × 10−9

Flavonoids biosynthesis (6)

6.486 × 10−9

Carbohydrates biosynthesis (9)

2.185 × 10−8

Sugars biosynthesis (8)

5.65 × 10−6

2 (22)

Nitrogen compounds metabolism (3)

1.077 × 10−5

Inorganic nutrients metabolism (3)

1.134×10−5

3 (21)

Fatty acids and lipids biosynthesis (8)

2.838 × 10−10

Cofactors, prosthetic groups, electroncarriers biosynthesis (8)

1.741 × 10−7

Phospholipid biosynthesis (6)

2.106 × 10−7

Quinol and quinone biosynthesis (3)

6.301 × 10−6

4 (17)

Vitamins biosynthesis (4)

3.871 × 10−6

8 (12)

Nucleosides and nucleotides biosynthesis (6)

1.831 × 10−13

Purine nucleotide biosynthesis (3)

7.213 × 10−6

11 (6)

Nucleosides and nucleotides degradation (5)

2.283 × 10−21

Purine nucleotides degradation (4)

2.128 × 10−13

Degradation/Utilization/Assimilation (5)

3.977 × 10−10

15 (3)

Amino acids biosynthesis (3)

1.642 × 10−6

22 (2)

Inorganic nutrients metabolism (2)

2.583 × 10−7

Sulfur compounds metabolism (2)

1.062 × 10−6

23 (2)

Transport (2)

1.256 × 10−5

  1. Classes of metabolic pathway that were significantly enriched in clusters at a 0.05 family-wide type I error rate. The number of pathways present in each cluster is given in parentheses in the first column, while the number of the given class of pathway within each cluster is given by parentheses in the second column.