Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of data analyses procedure for both transcriptomic and metabolomic data of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple fruit to predict postharvest soft scald risk

From: Gene expression and metabolism preceding soft scald, a chilling injury of ‘Honeycrisp’ apple fruit

Data type

Timepoints

Objective

Analysis

Transcriptomic, normalized

0–8 wk

Latent trends

Principal components analysis (PCA)

normalized

0–8 wk

Differential expression in the multivariate case

ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis

raw counts

0 wk

Pre-harvest environmental effects

RobiNA edge R differential expression according to soft scald riska

raw counts

2 wk

Effects of chilling

RobiNA edge R differential expression according to soft scald riska

 

-

Functional characterization of significant transcripts

Gene Ontology overrepresentation analysis

Metabolomic, means centered, standard deviation squared

0–8 wk

Latent trends

Principal components analysis (PCA)

0–8 wk

Differential expression in the multivariate case

ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis

0 wk

Pre-harvest environmental effects

t-test/ Pearson’s correlation + Ward clustering algorithm heatmap visualization

2 wk

Effects of chilling

t-test/ Pearson’s correlation + Ward clustering algorithm heatmap visualization

Transcriptomic and metabolomic, normalized and set to a common scale by means centering

0–8 wk

Correlation among expressed genes and metabolites

Pearson’s correlation via Cytoscape Expression Correlation plug-in at r = │0.95│, followed by network subtraction with the Network Analyzer plug-in

  1. Data sets were analyzed separately to find differences between high and low risk orchards at-harvest, after 2 weeks cold storage, and overall
  2. aSoft scald risk assigned categorically as “low risk”/“high risk” based on disorder incidence at 12 weeks of storage. “Low risk”, no fruit exhibited soft scald symptoms. “High risk”, the presence of any fruit with soft scald symptoms