Table 3 Change in the PR of proteins between DFD and control meats measured by FC and RC coefficients
From: The first evidence of global meat phosphoproteome changes in response to pre-slaughter stress
Spot no.a | Protein (isospot) | FC | RC | Spot no. | Protein (isospot) | FC | RC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PGM1 (1) | +∞ | + 0.44 | 24 | TNNT3 (3) | +∞ | + 0.70 |
5 | PGM1 (2) | −4.50 | −0.30 | 25 | TNNT3 (4) | +∞ | + 0.67 |
6 | UQCRC1 | -∞ | −0.13 | 26 | CAPZA2 | +∞ | + 0.77 |
7 | ENO3 (1) | +∞ | + 0.57 | 27 | ACTA1 (7) | -∞ | −0.39 |
8 | ENO3 (2) | +∞ | + 0.51 | 30 | TNNT1 (1) | -∞ | −0.78 |
9 | ENO3 (3) | +∞ | + 0.38 | 30A | TNNT1 (2) | +∞ | + 0.76 |
10 | ACTA1 (1) | +∞ | + 0.35 | 33 | HSPB1 (1) | -∞ | −0.52 |
11 | ACTA1 (2) | +∞ | + 0.33 | 34 | HSPB1 (2) | +∞ | + 0.73 |
15 | CKM (1) | +∞ | + 0.37 | 37 | HSPB1 (3) | +∞ | + 0.69 |
16 | CKM (2) | +∞ | + 0.32 | 44 | MYL6B (1) | -∞ | −0.49 |
18 | ACTA1 (3) | -∞ | −0.13 | 46 | MYL6B (2) | -∞ | −0.14 |
19 | ACTA1 (4) | -∞ | −0.16 | 50 | HSPB6 | -∞ | −0.10 |
20 | ACTA1 (5) | -∞ | −0.14 | 51 | MYL2 (1) | -∞ | −0.40 |
21 | ACTA1 (6) | -∞ | −0.12 | 52 | MYL2 (2) | -∞ | −0.39 |
22 | TNNT3 (1) | +∞ | + 0.74 | 53 | MYLPF (1) | +∞ | + 0.99 |
23 | TNNT3 (2) | +∞ | + 0.73 | 54 | MYLPF (2) | +∞ | + 1.00 |