Skip to main content

Table 2 Prediction performance in terms of Pearson’s correlation reported by McDowell (2016); A). Prediction performance in terms of Pearson’s correlation reported by Bellot et al. (2018); B) for traits height and heel bone mineral density. In set “BEST,” the 10 k or 50 k were chosen the top most-associated SNPs, with k = 1000, with the lowest P-values in a GWAS on the TRN set for each trait. In set “UNIF,” the genome was split in windows of equal physical length and the most associated SNP within each window was chosen. MLP denotes multilayer perceptron and CNN convolutional neural networks

From: A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection

A

Species

Trait

OLS

RR

LR

ER

BRR

MLP

 

Arabidopsis

Dry Matter

0.36

0.4

0.4

0.42

0.39

0.4

  

Flowering

0.8

0.82

0.83

0.82

0.82

0.86

 

Maize

Flowering

0.22

0.33

0.32

0.33

0.32

0.35

  

GY

0.47

0.59

0.49

0.51

0.57

0.55

 

Wheat

SGN

0.15

0.27

0.33

0.36

0.28

0.33

  

TYM

0.59

0.61

0.74

0.73

0.64

0.76

B

Species

Trait

Method

10kBEST

10kUNIF

50kBEST

50kUNIF

 
 

Human

Height

BayesB

0.47

0.38

0.48

0.42

 
  

Height

BRR

0.47

0.37

0.47

0.39

 
  

Height

MLP

0.45

0.36

0.45

0.39

 
  

Height

CNN

0.44

0.34

0.42

0.29

 
  

HBMD

BayesB

0.28

0.22

0.26

0.24

 
  

HBMD

BRR

0.28

0.21

0.24

0.22

 
  

HBMD

MLP

0.15

0.11

0.07

0.09

 
  

HBMD

CNN

0.27

0.18

0.10

0.11

 
  1. SGN spike grain number; TYM Time young microspore and HBMD Heel bone mineral density