Peer Review reports
From: Highly accurate long reads are crucial for realizing the potential of biodiversity genomics
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 8 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Holzer |
| 15 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Dec 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scott Hotaling |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Dec 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Jan 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Jan 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Holzer |
| 18 Jan 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 27 Jan 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Scott Hotaling |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Jan 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Feb 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Holzer |
| 15 Feb 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Feb 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Mar 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12864-023-09193-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.