Skip to main content

Table 1 Whole grapevine genome sequences published until today:

From: Chimeras in Merlot grapevine revealed by phased assembly

Authors

Year

Technology

Grapevine genotype

Size (mbp)

Haplotigs size (mbp)

Coverage

N50

(kbp)

BUSCO

[25]

Jaillon et al.

2007

Sanger

PN 40,024 (12x.v1)

487

 

8X

65.9

 

[26] Canaguier et al.

2017

Sanger

PN 40,024 (12x.v2)

  

12X

  

[28] Chin et al.

2017

PacBio RS II

Cabernet-Sauvignon

591

 

140X

72

80%

[29] Roach et al.

2018

PacBio RS II

Chardonnay

490

 

115X

935.8

95%

[30] Minio et al.

2019

PacBio RS II

Carmenère

622

 

115X

1 040

95%

[31] Girollet et al.

2019

PacBio RS II

Vitis riparia

500

 

225X

1 000

95%

[32] Massonnet et al.

2020

PacBio RS II

PacBio Sequel II

Muscadinia rotundifolia

460

364

115X

4 761

97%

Vitis arizonica b40-14

604

337

160X

1 536

96%

Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris O34-16

678

252

85X

998

97%

Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris DVIT3603.16

667

314

82X

2 661

97%

Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris DVIT3603.07

663

234

61X

1 169

97%

Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris DVIT3351.27

670

311

77X

1 778

97%

Zinfandel

591

306

94X

1 062

97%

Merlot

606

244

64X

810

94%

Black Corinth 2.1

672

288

63X

1 113

97%

Black Corinth seeded

650

357

75X

2 309

97%

Cabernet-Sauvignon

449

444

147X

24 161

97%

[33] Zou et al.

2021

PacBio Sequel I

Carmenère

623

420

112x

1 039

97%

PacBio Sequel I

Riesling

742

323

118x

2 970

98%

  1. Each references, are sorted by authors and publication year. The sequencing technology used is specified as well as the genotype’s name. The following data allows to compare sequencing quality by: the total size of the genome and the haplotig size, the average coverage, the N50 value which means that half of the genome is formed with contigs bigger than this size and the percentage of gene detected from BUSCO analysis