Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Genomics

Fig. 2

From: Validated WGS and WES protocols proved saliva-derived gDNA as an equivalent to blood-derived gDNA for clinical and population genomic analyses

Fig. 2

Results of comparisons shown as F1 scores for WGS and WES analyses individually. Results are arranged into four sections according to the used protocol and variant type. Each group contains plots for the five different genomic regions evaluated, i.e., whole reference genome or exome (WGS or WES), high-confidence regions (WGS_HCR or WES_HCR), non-difficult regions (WGS_NDR or WES_NDR), HCR and NDR intersection (WGS_HCR_NDR or WES_HCR_NDR), and problematic genomic regions (WGS_HARD or WES_HARD). Horizontal lines in each group represent the median value for a particular group. Data points represent individual samples inside each particular group. Dispersion of data points along the x axis inside each particular plot does not represent a range of values on this axis, rather a visual aid to allow better resolution of the data points

Back to article page